Composite vs Metal Antennas: Materials Impact on Signal Quality

Aviation antennas come in two main material types: metal and composite. These materials significantly impact radio signal quality in aircraft communications. This guide examines 7 critical differences between composite and metal antennas, helping aircraft owners and maintenance professionals make informed decisions based on performance requirements, operational environments, and budget considerations.

Understanding Aviation Antenna Materials: Fundamental Differences

Aviation antennas are manufactured using two primary material categories – metals (primarily aluminum) and composites (typically fiberglass or carbon fiber). Understanding their fundamental differences is essential before examining their impact on signal performance.

Photo	Popular Kids Walkie Talkies	Price
	Video Walkie Talkies for Kids, 2 Pack Rechargeable Walkie Talkies with Screen, Indoor Outdoor Toy for 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Year Old Girl, Christmas Birthday Gifts for Girls Age 3-12 (Pink)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT628 Kids Walkie Talkies,Army Toys for 6-12 Year Old Boys Girls,FRS Walky Talky with Key Lock,Gift for Outdoor Adventure Camping Hunt Trip(2 Pack,Camo)	Check Price On Amazon
	Video Walkie Talkie Toys for Kids Ages 3-12, 2 Pack Walkie Talkies with Screen, Long Range 2 Way Video Radios, Christmas Birthday Gifts for Boys Girls Indoor Outdoor Camping	Check Price On Amazon
	Construction Walkie Talkies for Kids 2 Pack Pretend Play Toys with Ultra Low Radiation Long Range 2000 Ft & Easy to Use for Outdoor Party Best Gift for Ages 2 3 4 5 6 7 Year Old Boys & Girls (Yellow)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis EZTalk 70 Walkie Talkies for Kids, Safe Mode 2 Way Radio Rechargeable Kids Walkie Talkies, Toys for Boys Girls 6-12 Year Old, Birthday Gifts Family Outdoor Hiking Camping 1 Pair	Check Price On Amazon

Metal antennas have been the traditional choice in aviation, offering excellent conductivity and established performance characteristics. Composite alternatives have gained popularity due to their lighter weight, corrosion resistance, and specific signal properties beneficial in certain applications.

The basic material differences affect numerous performance aspects:

Metal Antenna Composition and Properties

Metal antennas in aviation applications are predominantly made from aluminum alloys, though stainless steel and other metals are occasionally used. Their electrical and physical properties directly influence signal characteristics.

Most aviation metal antennas use 6061-T6 or 7075-T6 aluminum alloys, chosen for their excellent strength-to-weight ratio and corrosion resistance compared to other metals. These materials offer electrical conductivity values between 16-35 MS/m (megasiemens per meter), making them effective natural conductors for radio signals.

Key properties of metal antennas include:

• Natural electrical conductivity without additional elements
• Higher tensile strength (40,000-83,000 psi depending on alloy)
• Susceptibility to galvanic corrosion near dissimilar metals
• Excellent ground plane characteristics
• Manufacturing typically involves machining, extrusion, or stamping

Metal antennas face limitations including corrosion vulnerability (particularly in coastal environments), potential for mechanical fatigue at mounting points, and added weight that impacts fuel efficiency and payload capacity.

Composite Antenna Composition and Properties

Composite antennas utilize non-conductive materials like fiberglass or carbon fiber, often combined with resins and sometimes internal conductive elements. Their unique properties create distinct signal behavior compared to metal alternatives.

Standard aviation composite antennas typically use fiberglass-reinforced polymers (FRP) with epoxy or polyester resins. Carbon fiber composites are less common due to their RF shielding properties but may be used in specialized applications. The dielectric constant of these materials (typically 4-5 for fiberglass composites) affects how radio waves propagate through and around the antenna structure.

Key properties of composite antennas include:

• Dielectric properties allowing RF transparency in non-conductive sections
• Superior strength-to-weight ratio (typically 20-30% stronger than aluminum at equal weight)
• Excellent corrosion resistance, particularly in salt environments
• Manufacturing involves layup techniques, molding, and curing processes
• Design flexibility allowing complex shapes for optimized radiation patterns

Composite antennas have limitations including higher initial cost, potential UV degradation without proper protection, and more complex manufacturing requirements that can affect quality consistency.

Signal Quality Factor #1: Frequency Response Characteristics

The frequency response of an antenna—how it performs across different radio frequencies—is significantly influenced by the material from which it’s constructed. This impacts both transmission and reception quality across aviation communication bands.

Metal antennas generally provide consistent performance across wider frequency ranges due to their natural conductivity. They typically offer bandwidth of 10-15% of their center frequency without additional tuning elements. For example, a VHF communications antenna centered at 127.5 MHz might effectively operate from 118-137 MHz without performance degradation.

Composite antennas with integrated conductive elements can be more precisely tuned for specific frequency ranges, sometimes achieving narrower bandwidths with higher gain at the target frequencies. This frequency selectivity can be beneficial for reducing interference in congested radio environments.

The material impact varies by frequency band:

• VHF Band (118-137 MHz): Both materials perform well, with metal showing slightly better omnidirectional characteristics
• HF Band (2-30 MHz): Metal antennas typically provide superior performance due to better conductivity for these longer wavelengths
• UHF/Satellite Bands (above 300 MHz): Composite antennas often match or exceed metal performance, particularly when precisely tuned

Radiation pattern measurements show that material choice affects not only frequency response but also signal distribution. Metal antennas typically produce more consistent omnidirectional patterns, while composites can be engineered to emphasize specific directions when desired.

Signal Quality Factor #2: Environmental Resilience and Performance Stability

Aviation antennas operate in extreme environmental conditions—from high-altitude cold to tropical humidity and everything in between. The material choice significantly affects how signal quality maintains stability across these varying environments.

Environmental factors affect antenna materials differently, with direct consequences for signal performance:

Environmental testing shows that composite antennas generally maintain more consistent performance across varying conditions, while metal antennas may experience more significant performance fluctuations but often provide higher peak performance under ideal conditions.

Cold Weather and High-Altitude Performance Comparison

At high altitudes and in cold weather operations, antenna materials face unique challenges that directly impact signal quality and reliability.

Metal antennas experience several cold-weather phenomena affecting signal quality:

• Thermal contraction alters resonant frequency (typically 0.5-1.5% shift at -40°F)
• Increased electrical conductivity in colder temperatures (2-4% improvement)
• Higher ice accumulation rates due to thermal conductivity
• Greater brittleness at extreme cold (below -40°F)

Composite antennas demonstrate different cold-weather characteristics:

• More stable dimensions with temperature changes (typically 0.1-0.3% dimensional change)
• Minor changes in dielectric properties affecting tuning (0.2-0.7% shift)
• Lower ice accumulation due to thermal insulating properties
• Maintained flexibility even at extreme temperatures

For high-altitude operations above 25,000 feet, composite antennas generally maintain more consistent performance due to their stability in extreme temperature variations. However, metal antennas often provide superior performance in moderate cold conditions between 0°F and 32°F due to improved conductivity.

Tropical and Maritime Environment Performance

In tropical and maritime environments, humidity, salt exposure, and extreme heat create distinct challenges for antenna materials, with significant implications for signal quality.

Metal antennas in these environments face:

• Accelerated corrosion from salt exposure (visible pitting within 3-6 months without protection)
• Signal attenuation of 5-15% after one year in unprotected coastal environments
• Thermal expansion shifting tuned frequency by 0.3-0.8% at high temperatures
• Need for regular maintenance to prevent performance degradation

Composite antennas demonstrate significant advantages in these conditions:

• Near-immunity to salt corrosion
• Minimal performance change (<1%) after years in maritime environments
• More stable tuning in temperature fluctuations
• Potential for moisture absorption affecting dielectric properties in prolonged 100% humidity

For aircraft operating in coastal, island, or tropical regions, annual radio inspections typically reveal that composite antennas maintain 90-95% of original performance after five years, while unprotected metal antennas often degrade to 60-70% effectiveness in the same timeframe.

Signal Quality Factor #3: Electrical Efficiency and Signal Loss

The electrical efficiency of an antenna—its ability to convert radio frequency energy into electromagnetic waves with minimal loss—varies significantly between material types, directly impacting effective communication range and clarity.

Metal antennas provide excellent electrical conductivity as an inherent material property. Aluminum antennas typically achieve radiation efficiencies of 90-95% under ideal conditions, with signal losses primarily occurring at connection points and through skin effect phenomena at higher frequencies.

Composite antennas rely on integrated conductive elements, creating more complex electrical pathways. Their radiation efficiency ranges from 80-92% depending on design and frequency, with additional losses occurring through the dielectric material itself.

Key efficiency factors include:

• Conductivity: Metal antennas utilize the entire structure for conduction, while composites rely on specific conductive paths
• Impedance matching: Metal antennas typically present more consistent impedance (50-52 ohms) across frequency ranges compared to composites (48-55 ohms)
• Skin effect: At higher frequencies, current flows primarily on conductor surfaces, affecting metal antennas differently than composite designs
• Connection losses: Metal antennas experience 0.1-0.3 dB additional loss at connector points compared to well-designed composite interfaces

Testing shows that metal antennas generally provide 3-8% greater transmission distance for the same power input in VHF communications. However, this advantage diminishes at higher frequencies where composite designs can be optimized for specific bands.

Signal loss measurements using specialized test equipment reveal that metal antennas experience 0.2-0.5 dB less insertion loss across typical aviation frequency ranges, translating to 5-12% stronger signals under comparable conditions.

Signal Quality Factor #4: Radiation Pattern and Directional Characteristics

An antenna’s radiation pattern—the three-dimensional representation of its signal transmission and reception strength—is significantly influenced by its material composition, affecting communication consistency across different aircraft attitudes.

Metal antennas typically produce more consistent omnidirectional patterns, characterized by:

• Signal strength variation of ±2-3 dB around the horizontal plane
• Predictable null points directly above and below the antenna
• Broader main lobes with fewer sharp transitions
• Greater symmetry in the radiation pattern

Composite antennas can be engineered for specific radiation characteristics:

• Capability for more shaped patterns when desired
• Typical variation of ±3-5 dB around the horizontal plane
• Potential for reduced null depth at antenna poles
• Ability to optimize for specific directions through material and conductor placement

Aircraft attitude changes affect reception differently between materials. When an aircraft banks at 30°, metal antennas typically maintain signal strength within 1.5-2.5 dB of level flight performance. Composite antennas may experience 2-4 dB variations under the same conditions, though specialized designs can minimize this effect.

The dual antenna setup benefits of diversity systems can help mitigate these differences, providing more consistent coverage regardless of aircraft attitude.

For practical operations, metal antennas generally provide more predictable communication performance across varied flight attitudes, while composite antennas can be optimized for specific operational profiles or frequency bands.

Signal Quality Factor #5: Durability and Performance Degradation Over Time

The longevity of signal quality is directly tied to antenna material durability. Understanding how different materials degrade over time provides critical insight into long-term performance expectations and maintenance requirements.

Metal antennas follow a predictable degradation pattern:

• Initial performance period (1-2 years): Maintains 95-100% of original specifications
• Early degradation (2-4 years): Surface oxidation and connection corrosion begin, reducing efficiency to 85-95%
• Mid-life performance (4-7 years): Accelerating corrosion and potential mechanical stress reduce performance to 70-85%
• Late-life performance (7+ years): Significant performance degradation below 70% of original specifications

Composite antennas demonstrate different aging characteristics:

• Initial performance period (1-3 years): Maintains 98-100% of original specifications
• Early degradation (3-6 years): Minor UV and environmental effects begin, reducing efficiency to 90-98%
• Mid-life performance (6-10 years): Gradual degradation of resins and seals, performance at 85-90%
• Late-life performance (10+ years): Potential internal conductor issues, performance typically remains above 80%

Mean time between failure statistics show metal antennas typically requiring replacement or significant service after 5-8 years, while quality composite antennas often remain serviceable for 8-12 years under similar conditions.

Early warning signs of performance degradation differ by material:

• Metal antennas: Visible corrosion, increasing VSWR readings, intermittent communications, decreased range
• Composite antennas: Discoloration, hairline cracks, gradual range reduction, moisture indicators at base

Regular inspection and testing should include SWR measurements, visual inspection, and range testing. Implementing a proactive maintenance schedule significantly extends functional lifespan regardless of material choice.

Signal Quality Factor #6: Installation Considerations and Aircraft Integration

The signal quality of any antenna is heavily dependent on proper installation, with material-specific considerations that significantly impact performance. Understanding these differences ensures optimal integration with aircraft systems.

Metal antennas require specific installation protocols:

• Bonding requirements: Direct electrical connection to aircraft ground plane
• Torque specifications: Typically 20-25 inch-pounds to prevent loosening without damaging the base
• Conductive sealants: Required at base to prevent moisture intrusion and maintain electrical contact
• Dissimilar metal considerations: Potential for galvanic corrosion requiring insulators or compatible metals
• Cable routing: Minimum bend radius typically 3 inches to prevent shield damage

Composite antennas have different installation requirements:

• Grounding considerations: Separate ground strap often needed for lightning protection
• Torque specifications: Generally lower at 15-20 inch-pounds to prevent damage to composite base
• Non-conductive sealants: Required at base to prevent moisture without affecting RF characteristics
• Mounting surface preparation: May require special considerations for composite aircraft skins
• RF transparent zones: Spacing requirements from metal structures to prevent pattern distortion

Common installation errors that degrade signal quality include:

• Improper grounding (particularly problematic for metal antennas)
• Insufficient weatherproofing at the base (affects both types but more critical for metal)
• Cable routing too close to noise sources (impacts both equally)
• Incorrect torque application (more likely to damage composite antennas)
• Poor coaxial cable selection (affects overall system performance regardless of antenna type)

When retrofitting an aircraft from one antenna material to another, special attention must be paid to mounting adaptations, ground plane requirements, and potential interference patterns with existing equipment.

Special Considerations for Composite Aircraft

Composite aircraft structures present unique challenges and opportunities for antenna installation, with material-specific considerations that directly impact signal quality.

The fundamental challenge with composite airframes is the lack of a natural ground plane that metal aircraft skins provide. This affects antenna types differently:

• Metal antennas on composite aircraft require:
  • Artificial ground plane creation (typically copper foil at least 1/4 wavelength in diameter)
  • Enhanced lightning protection systems
  • Additional bonding straps to aircraft grounding points
• Composite antennas on composite aircraft require:
  • Careful consideration of ground reference for balanced operation
  • Strategic placement relative to internal metal structures
  • Specialized mounting plates with integrated ground planes for certain antenna types

Signal attenuation through composite structures varies by frequency:

• VHF frequencies (118-137 MHz): 0.5-1.5 dB attenuation through typical composite skins
• UHF frequencies (above 300 MHz): 1.5-4 dB attenuation requiring more careful placement

Carbon fiber composites present special challenges due to their partial conductivity, creating potential RF reflections and interference patterns. Fiberglass sections are preferred for antenna mounting when available.

Manufacturers like Cirrus, Diamond, and newer Cessna models provide specific antenna installation guidelines for their composite structures, often recommending particular antenna types and mounting locations to ensure optimal performance.

Signal Quality Factor #7: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Decision Framework

Selecting the optimal antenna material requires balancing performance requirements against budget constraints, operational environment, and maintenance capabilities. This structured analysis framework provides a systematic approach to making this important decision.

Initial cost comparisons show significant differences:

• Metal VHF communications antennas: $150-450 price range
• Composite VHF communications antennas: $350-800 price range
• Metal navigation antennas (VOR/LOC/GS): $400-900 price range
• Composite navigation antennas: $700-1,500 price range

Total cost of ownership calculations reveal a different picture when including maintenance and replacement costs over a 10-year period. For a typical general aviation aircraft operating 200 hours annually:

• Metal antenna 10-year cost: $600-1,200 (including 1-2 replacements and maintenance)
• Composite antenna 10-year cost: $700-1,500 (typically one antenna with minimal maintenance)

Decision matrix factors should be weighted according to your specific priorities:

The appropriate choice varies significantly based on aircraft type and operational environment. For example:

• Coastal operations strongly favor composite antennas despite higher initial cost
• Aircraft with frequent maintenance access may benefit from the lower initial cost of metal antennas
• High-performance aircraft gain more benefit from the weight savings of composite antennas
• Aircraft operating in areas with frequency coordination challenges may benefit from the tuning stability of composite antennas

Return on investment analysis shows composite antennas typically becoming more cost-effective between years 5-7 of operation due to reduced maintenance and longer service life.

Expert Insights: Material Selection for Specific Aviation Applications

We consulted certified avionics technicians, engineers, and experienced pilots to provide expert recommendations for specific aviation applications, considering the unique signal quality requirements of each scenario.

Thomas Reynolds, FAA Certified Avionics Technician with 22 years of experience, explains: “The choice between composite and metal antennas should be driven primarily by the aircraft’s operational environment and maintenance situation. For aircraft based in coastal regions, the corrosion resistance of composites justifies the higher initial investment every time.”

Application-specific recommendations from industry experts:

• Commercial airline operations: Composite antennas are standard due to their durability and reduced maintenance requirements, with the higher initial cost easily justified by longer service life and reliability
• General aviation piston aircraft: Metal antennas remain popular for lower acquisition cost, but composite options offer better value for aircraft operated in humid or coastal environments
• Business jet applications: Predominantly composite due to performance stability across varied environments and reduced maintenance during tight operational schedules
• Helicopter operations: Strong preference for composite due to vibration resistance and reduced weight, particularly important for performance-critical operations
• Experimental/homebuilt aircraft: Metal antennas often preferred for cost and simpler installation, though weight-sensitive designs increasingly choose composite
• Seaplane/amphibious operations: Composite strongly recommended due to water and salt exposure, with metal options requiring significantly more maintenance

Sandra Martinez, Avionics Engineering Specialist, notes: “The performance differences between materials become most apparent in extreme conditions. In moderate environments with regular maintenance, either type can perform adequately, but composite antennas provide more consistent performance across a wider range of conditions.”

For specialized communication systems, material preferences also emerge:

• VHF communications: Both materials perform well, with selection based more on environmental factors
• HF long-distance: Metal antennas generally preferred for better efficiency at lower frequencies
• Satellite communications: Composite designs often preferred for weight savings and pattern consistency
• Emergency locator transmitters: Composite strongly preferred for impact resistance and environmental durability

Captain James Wilson, with over 12,000 flight hours, adds: “In my experience flying everything from bush planes to jets, I’ve found composite antennas provide more consistent communications in marginal conditions. The performance difference is subtle in good conditions but becomes significant when operating at range limits or in poor weather.”

Future Developments: Emerging Materials and Technologies

Antenna material technology continues to evolve, with new composites, manufacturing techniques, and hybrid designs promising to further improve signal quality while addressing traditional limitations.

Advanced composite formulations under development include:

• Ceramic-polymer composites offering improved temperature stability across -80°F to +220°F ranges
• Nano-carbon infused materials providing controlled conductivity without full RF shielding
• Self-healing polymer systems that maintain structural integrity after minor damage
• Metamaterial-inspired structures that manipulate RF in ways traditional materials cannot

Manufacturing advancements are reducing the cost gap between materials:

• Automated layup techniques reducing composite manufacturing costs by 15-30%
• 3D printing of complex antenna structures with embedded conductive elements
• Hybrid manufacturing combining the advantages of multiple material types
• Precision molding techniques improving consistency in composite electrical properties

Hybrid designs represent a significant development trend, with systems incorporating:

• Composite structures with precisely placed metallic elements for optimal electrical performance
• Selective metallization techniques applying conductive layers only where needed
• Composite-encapsulated metal elements providing corrosion resistance with metal conductivity
• Multi-material designs optimized for specific frequency bands within a single antenna

Research from military and space applications is gradually filtering into commercial aviation, with technologies like conformal load-bearing antenna structures (CLAS) integrating antenna functions directly into aircraft structural components.

Industry projections suggest hybrid designs will become increasingly common over the next 3-5 years, with pure metal antennas becoming less common except in specific applications where their electrical properties remain advantageous.

Comprehensive Maintenance Guide by Material Type

Maintaining optimal signal quality requires material-specific maintenance protocols. This comprehensive guide provides scheduled maintenance procedures, inspection criteria, and troubleshooting approaches for both composite and metal antennas.

Metal antenna maintenance schedule:

• Every 100 hours/Annual:
  • Visual inspection for corrosion, particularly at base and mounting hardware
  • Check mounting torque (20-25 inch-pounds typically)
  • Inspect coaxial connection for moisture or corrosion
  • Test VSWR if communication issues reported (should be under 1.5:1)
• Every 2 years or 500 hours:
  • Remove antenna and inspect mounting base
  • Clean all connections with appropriate electrical contact cleaner
  • Apply fresh conductive sealant at base
  • Check cable connection resistance (should be under 0.1 ohm)
  • Verify ground bonding resistance (under 0.003 ohm to airframe)

Composite antenna maintenance schedule:

• Every 100 hours/Annual:
  • Visual inspection for cracks, discoloration, or damage
  • Check mounting hardware torque (15-20 inch-pounds typically)
  • Inspect coaxial connection for moisture
  • Test VSWR if communication issues reported (should be under 1.5:1)
• Every 3 years or 1,000 hours:
  • Detailed inspection of mounting integrity
  • Check for UV degradation of composite material
  • Inspect and clean cable connections
  • Verify ground strap integrity if present

Performance testing procedures should include:

• VSWR measurement using an antenna analyzer (target under 1.5:1 across operating band)
• Range testing with ground stations at known distances
• Pattern testing by communicating during controlled flight maneuvers
• Receiver sensitivity checks using weak signal sources

When inspecting antennas, specific warning signs differ by material:

• Metal antenna warning signs:
  • White or green corrosion products at base or elements
  • Pitting or discoloration of metal surfaces
  • Loose mounting hardware or movement at base
  • Bent or misaligned elements
• Composite antenna warning signs:
  • Hairline cracks in the surface
  • Yellowing or color changes indicating UV damage
  • Soft spots indicating internal delamination
  • Water ingress indicators at drain holes

Replacement is recommended when:

• VSWR exceeds 2.0:1 across significant portions of the operating band
• Physical damage affects more than 10% of the antenna structure
• Communication range has decreased by more than 25% from baseline
• Corrosion has progressed beyond surface treatment capability
• Water has penetrated internal antenna components

Maintaining proper documentation of antenna performance provides valuable trending data to predict when replacement will be necessary before communication failures occur.

Conclusion: Making the Optimal Antenna Material Choice

The choice between composite and metal antennas significantly impacts aviation radio signal quality across multiple dimensions. By considering these seven critical factors in the context of your specific aircraft and operational requirements, you can make an informed decision that optimizes communication reliability and performance.

Key decision factors to consider include:

• Operational environment (coastal, high-altitude, tropical)
• Expected maintenance schedule and accessibility
• Initial budget constraints versus long-term ownership costs
• Performance requirements for specific communication systems
• Aircraft type and structural materials
• Weight sensitivity and performance impacts

For most modern aviation applications, composite antennas provide advantages in durability, maintenance requirements, and consistent performance across environmental conditions. Metal antennas continue to offer cost advantages and excellent performance in moderate environments with regular maintenance.

Before making your selection, use the decision matrix provided earlier in this guide to weigh factors according to your specific priorities. Consider consulting with a certified avionics technician familiar with your aircraft and operational profile for personalized recommendations.

Regardless of material choice, proper installation, regular inspection, and appropriate maintenance are the most critical factors in ensuring continued high-quality communications. Even the best antenna will underperform if improperly installed or maintained.

As antenna technology continues to evolve, hybrid designs combining the advantages of both material types will likely become increasingly available, potentially offering the ideal balance of performance, durability, and cost for future aviation communication systems.

For aircraft owners seeking an aircraft station license application, the antenna system is a critical component that requires proper documentation and compliance with regulations.

TOP RATED WALKIE TALKIES

Photo	Model	Price
	Retevis RT628 Walkie Talkies for Kids,Toy Gifts for 6-12 Year Old Boys Girls,Kid Gifts Walkie Talkie for Adults Outdoor Camping Hiking(Silvery 1 Pair)	Check Price On Amazon
	Cobra ACXT545 Weather-Resistant Walkie Talkies - Rechargeable, 22 Channels, Long Range 28-Mile Two-Way Radio Set (2-Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT388 Walkie Talkies for Kids, Toys for 6 7 8 9 12 Year Old Boys, 22 Ch 2 Way Radio Backlit LCD Flashlight, Blue Walkie Talkies for Kids Gifts Christmas Stocking Stuffers(Blue, 2 Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Cobra RX680 Walkie Talkies (2-Pack) - Rugged & Splashproof Two Way Radios Long Range, IP54 Water Resistant Design, 60 Pre-Programmed Channels, Weather Alerts, Included Charging Dock (Black/Orange)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT22 Walkie Talkies, Mini 2 Way Radio Rechargeable, VOX Handsfree, Portable, Two-Way Radios Long Range with Earpiece, for Family Road Trip Camping Hiking Skiing(2 Pack, Black)	Check Price On Amazon
	Midland GXT1000VP4 GMRS Two-Way Radio (50-Channel, Long Range, 142 Privacy Codes, SOS, NOAA, Rechargeable Nickle Battery, Black/Silver, 2-Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT628 Walkie Talkies for Kids,Toys Gifts for 6-12 Years Old Boys Girls,Long Range 2 Way Radio 22CH VOX,Birthday Gift,Family Walkie Talkie for Camping Hiking Indoor Outdoor	Check Price On Amazon