EASA Requirements: CE Marking and European Compliance Guide

Aviation radio equipment manufacturers face dual regulatory challenges in Europe. They must comply with EASA airworthiness requirements while also meeting CE marking standards. This guide explains both certification systems, their intersection, and provides a step-by-step approach to achieving compliant aviation radio equipment for the European market.

Understanding the Regulatory Framework for Aviation Radio Equipment

Aviation radio equipment in Europe is subject to a complex regulatory framework that includes both aviation-specific requirements from EASA and general product safety standards enforced through CE marking. Understanding how these systems interact is essential for successful certification.

Photo	Popular Kids Walkie Talkies	Price
	Video Walkie Talkies for Kids, 2 Pack Rechargeable Walkie Talkies with Screen, Indoor Outdoor Toy for 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Year Old Girl, Christmas Birthday Gifts for Girls Age 3-12 (Pink)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT628 Kids Walkie Talkies,Army Toys for 6-12 Year Old Boys Girls,FRS Walky Talky with Key Lock,Gift for Outdoor Adventure Camping Hunt Trip(2 Pack,Camo)	Check Price On Amazon
	Video Walkie Talkie Toys for Kids Ages 3-12, 2 Pack Walkie Talkies with Screen, Long Range 2 Way Video Radios, Christmas Birthday Gifts for Boys Girls Indoor Outdoor Camping	Check Price On Amazon
	Construction Walkie Talkies for Kids 2 Pack Pretend Play Toys with Ultra Low Radiation Long Range 2000 Ft & Easy to Use for Outdoor Party Best Gift for Ages 2 3 4 5 6 7 Year Old Boys & Girls (Yellow)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis EZTalk 70 Walkie Talkies for Kids, Safe Mode 2 Way Radio Rechargeable Kids Walkie Talkies, Toys for Boys Girls 6-12 Year Old, Birthday Gifts Family Outdoor Hiking Camping 1 Pair	Check Price On Amazon

EASA (European Union Aviation Safety Agency) establishes and enforces safety standards for all aspects of civil aviation in Europe. For radio equipment, EASA focuses on airworthiness, reliability, and performance standards specific to aviation applications. Their requirements ensure radio equipment functions properly in aviation environments and integrates safely with aircraft systems.

CE marking, meanwhile, indicates a product’s compliance with EU health, safety, and environmental protection standards. For radio equipment, this primarily involves conformity with the Radio Equipment Directive 2014/53/EU (RED), which addresses radio frequency performance, electromagnetic compatibility, and safety.

While these regulatory frameworks have different origins and purposes, they overlap significantly for aviation radio equipment. Manufacturers must navigate both systems, as compliance with one does not automatically ensure compliance with the other. EASA certification focuses on aviation-specific performance and safety, while CE marking addresses broader product safety and electromagnetic compatibility concerns.

The regulatory landscape becomes even more complex for international operators who may need to understand Transport Canada radio approval requirements or other international standards alongside European regulations.

Key Differences Between EASA Certification and CE Marking

While both regulatory frameworks aim to ensure safety and performance, EASA certification and CE marking have fundamentally different approaches, requirements, and processes that manufacturers must navigate.

These differences impact manufacturers in several ways. EASA certification typically involves more rigorous aviation-specific testing and often requires authority involvement. CE marking can sometimes be completed through self-declaration for certain equipment categories. Additionally, EASA focuses on how the equipment performs in aviation environments, while CE marking addresses broader consumer safety concerns.

Products requiring both certifications include permanently installed aircraft radio equipment sold in the EU market. Portable aviation radios used exclusively for aviation purposes may qualify for certain exemptions from standard CE marking requirements, though this varies by equipment type and intended use.

When Aviation Radio Equipment Requires CE Marking

Not all aviation radio equipment requires CE marking, but determining applicability can be complex. This section provides clear guidance on when your aviation radio products must comply with CE marking requirements.

Aviation radio equipment generally requires CE marking when:

• It operates within radio frequency bands governed by the Radio Equipment Directive
• It is placed on the EU market for sale or distribution
• It is not exclusively covered by other specific directives

Exemptions may apply for:

• Equipment exclusively used for military or state security purposes
• Equipment covered by international agreements governing mutual recognition of conformity
• Custom-built evaluation kits destined for professionals for R&D purposes

The intended use significantly impacts requirements. Equipment designed for commercial aviation typically faces stricter standards than equipment for general aviation. Similarly, equipment permanently installed in aircraft may have different requirements than portable devices.

Recent regulatory updates have clarified that even specialized aviation radio equipment must generally comply with CE marking requirements when sold in the EU market, with fewer exemptions than previously understood. Manufacturers should carefully assess each product against current requirements rather than relying on historical exemption patterns.

The Complete Certification Process for Aviation Radio Equipment

Achieving compliant aviation radio equipment requires a systematic approach that addresses both EASA requirements and CE marking. This comprehensive process guide outlines each step from initial design considerations to market access.

1. Design Planning: Incorporate regulatory requirements into initial design specifications
2. Requirements Analysis: Identify applicable standards for both EASA and CE marking
3. Design Implementation: Develop the product with compliance requirements in mind
4. Pre-compliance Testing: Conduct internal testing to verify compliance before formal assessment
5. Technical File Preparation: Compile comprehensive documentation for both regulatory frameworks
6. Conformity Assessment: Conduct formal testing and assessment (via Notified Body if required)
7. Declaration of Conformity: Prepare and sign formal declaration for CE marking
8. EASA Approval Application: Submit application with supporting documentation
9. Apply CE Marking: Apply the CE mark to compliant products
10. Market Access: Release the product to the European market
11. Post-market Surveillance: Monitor performance and address any issues

This process typically takes 6-12 months for complex aviation radio equipment, with EASA approval often being the longer critical path. Manufacturers with established quality systems and previous certification experience may achieve faster timelines.

Key stakeholders include internal engineering and quality teams, regulatory affairs specialists, test laboratories, Notified Bodies for CE marking, and EASA or authorized representatives for aviation certification.

Initial Design Considerations for Compliance

Successful certification begins in the design phase. Incorporating compliance considerations from the start can significantly reduce costs, prevent redesign cycles, and accelerate market access.

For EASA compliance, consider:

• Applicable ETSOs (European Technical Standard Orders) for radio equipment
• Environmental qualification requirements (temperature, altitude, vibration)
• Power supply characteristics and backup requirements
• Interface specifications with other aircraft systems
• Failure mode analysis and redundancy requirements

For CE marking, consider:

• Radio frequency band compliance with RED directive
• Electromagnetic compatibility requirements
• Electrical safety standards
• Material restrictions (RoHS, REACH compliance)
• User documentation requirements

Common design pitfalls include inadequate EMC shielding, insufficient environmental testing margins, and overlooking software certification requirements. Addressing these early in the design phase prevents costly redesigns later.

Adopting a standards-first approach where design specifications directly reference applicable regulatory standards helps ensure compliance is built into the product rather than assessed afterward.

Technical File Preparation: Documentation Requirements

The technical file is the cornerstone of your compliance demonstration. This comprehensive documentation package must satisfy both EASA and CE marking requirements while providing clear evidence of conformity.

A complete technical file for aviation radio equipment typically includes:

• Product description and intended use specification
• Design drawings, schematics, and specifications
• Risk assessment documentation
• List of applied standards and specifications
• Test reports from accredited laboratories
• User and installation manuals
• Declaration of Conformity (for CE marking)
• Quality system documentation
• Software certification evidence (if applicable)
• Production control procedures

Documentation requirements vary by equipment type. For example, software-defined radios require additional documentation related to software verification and validation, while simpler equipment may have streamlined requirements.

Common documentation deficiencies include incomplete test reports, missing standards references, and inadequate risk assessments. These issues frequently cause certification delays, as authorities and Notified Bodies typically halt their review until documentation is complete.

Implement robust document control systems with clear versioning, approval workflows, and traceability matrices to ensure documentation remains current and consistent throughout the certification process.

Conformity Assessment Options: Self-Declaration vs. Notified Body

For CE marking, manufacturers must determine the appropriate conformity assessment procedure. This critical decision impacts testing requirements, costs, timelines, and market perception.

Self-declaration (Module A) is possible when:

• The product falls under harmonized standards with no special requirements
• The equipment is not complex or safety-critical
• The manufacturer has strong internal testing capabilities

Notified Body involvement is required when:

• Harmonized standards don’t fully cover the product
• The equipment operates in restricted frequency bands
• The equipment performs safety-critical functions

The choice significantly impacts both cost and timeline. Self-declaration typically costs 30-50% less and can reduce time-to-market by 2-3 months. However, Notified Body certification often provides stronger market credibility and may be preferred by customers even when not strictly required.

When selecting a Notified Body, look for organizations with specific aviation radio experience and recognition by aviation authorities. Recommended bodies include TÜV SÜD, Dekra, and Eurofins, all of which have specialized aviation departments familiar with both CE and EASA requirements.

Testing Requirements for Aviation Radio Equipment

Testing is the core of compliance demonstration for aviation radio equipment. This section outlines the specific tests required for both EASA certification and CE marking, with guidance on test planning and execution.

Core testing requirements typically include:

Testing costs vary significantly based on equipment complexity and test requirements. Basic CE testing packages start around €15,000, while comprehensive EASA testing can exceed €100,000 for complex systems.

To reduce testing costs:

• Conduct thorough pre-compliance testing in-house
• Bundle test campaigns with accredited laboratories
• Reuse test results for product variants where possible
• Schedule tests strategically to avoid rush fees

Common testing failures include EMC issues, environmental qualification failures, and software verification gaps. Addressing these areas with particular attention during development reduces costly test failures.

Test reports must be comprehensive, detailing test setup, methodologies, results, and compliance conclusions. Reports should explicitly reference applicable standards and clearly indicate pass/fail status for each requirement.

Radio Equipment Directive (RED) Specific Testing Requirements

The Radio Equipment Directive (RED) imposes specific testing requirements focused on radio frequency performance, electromagnetic compatibility, and safety that must be carefully addressed for CE marking compliance.

Essential requirements under RED include:

• Radio spectrum use efficiency (Article 3.2)
• Electromagnetic compatibility (Article 3.1b)
• Safety and health protection (Article 3.1a)
• Security requirements (for specific equipment types)

Key harmonized standards providing presumption of conformity include:

• EN 302 842 for VHF air-ground communications
• EN 301 489-22 for EMC of aeronautical mobile radio equipment
• EN 60950 or EN 62368 for electrical safety

For aviation radios operating in specific frequency bands (108-137 MHz, 960-1215 MHz), special testing requirements apply to ensure they don’t interfere with critical navigation systems. Test parameters must be precisely documented according to ETSI guidelines.

Recent RED updates have introduced new requirements for software-defined radios, including additional documentation of software security measures and verification that radio parameters cannot be altered in ways that would violate compliance.

The RED technical documentation must explicitly demonstrate how each essential requirement is met, with clear traceability between requirements, applicable standards, and test results.

EASA-Specific Testing and Qualification Requirements

EASA imposes additional aviation-specific testing requirements that focus on airworthiness, reliability, and performance in the demanding aviation environment. These requirements complement and sometimes exceed CE marking standards.

Key EASA requirements include:

• ETSO-2C169a for VHF radio communication equipment
• ETSO-2C128 for devices that prevent blocked channels
• ETSO-C165a for electronic map systems
• Environmental testing per EUROCAE ED-14/RTCA DO-160

Environmental testing is particularly rigorous, covering:

• Temperature extremes (-55°C to +70°C for some equipment)
• Rapid decompression scenarios
• Vibration profiles matching aircraft types
• Humidity and fluid susceptibility
• Lightning and electromagnetic effects

Software certification per DO-178C applies to programmable devices, with required rigor (Design Assurance Level) determined by the potential failure effects. For critical communication equipment, this often means Level C or D compliance.

Hardware certification per DO-254 applies to complex electronic hardware, with similar risk-based Design Assurance Levels determining verification requirements.

Requirements vary significantly based on aircraft category. Commercial transport aircraft face stricter standards than general aviation, and permanently installed equipment has more stringent requirements than portable devices. Manufacturers should carefully determine which requirements apply to their specific product and intended installation.

Companies dealing with international aviation certification may also benefit from understanding Australian CASA standards and type acceptance procedures, which often align with EASA requirements.

Declaration of Conformity and Technical Documentation

Once testing is complete, manufacturers must formally document compliance through properly structured declarations and technical documentation. This section provides guidance on preparing these critical documents.

The EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC) must include:

1. Product identification (model, type, batch or serial number)
2. Manufacturer’s name and address
3. Statement that the declaration is issued under the manufacturer’s sole responsibility
4. Object of the declaration (identifying the radio equipment)
5. Reference to relevant harmonized standards used
6. Reference to specifications for which conformity is declared
7. Notified Body information (if applicable)
8. Signed statement of conformity with relevant Union legislation
9. Signature, name, and function of authorized person
10. Date and place of issue

The technical documentation package should be organized in a clear, logical structure with a master index document providing navigation guidance. Electronic documentation should use consistent file naming conventions and include a version control system.

Common documentation errors include missing references to applied standards, incomplete product identification, and improper signatory authority. These issues can delay market access even when the product itself is compliant.

Documentation must be retained for 10 years after the last product is manufactured. Establish secure archive systems with appropriate backup procedures to ensure long-term availability.

For product modifications, establish a change management process that evaluates the impact on existing documentation and updates all affected documents accordingly. Even minor changes require documentation updates to maintain compliance.

CE Marking Application and Usage Requirements

The CE marking itself must be applied according to specific requirements regarding size, placement, and formatting. Incorrect application can result in non-compliance despite meeting all technical requirements.

CE marking specifications include:

• Minimum height of 5mm (unless reduced for small equipment)
• Proportions maintained per official CE logo template
• Visible, legible, and indelible marking
• Placement on product or data plate (or packaging if necessary)

For aviation radio equipment, the CE mark must be accompanied by:

• Manufacturer identification (name or registered trademark)
• Product type, batch, or serial number
• Notified Body identification number (if applicable)

For equipment too small for full marking, simplified marking may be used on the device with complete information provided in accompanying documentation or packaging.

Equipment with integrated displays may use electronic labeling (e-labeling) for regulatory markings, provided the information is easily accessible to users and automatically displayed during equipment startup.

Prohibited practices include applying CE marking to products outside the scope of applicable directives, applying marks that could be confused with the CE marking, or applying the CE mark before completing the conformity assessment process.

Managing Certification Throughout Product Lifecycle

Certification is not a one-time event but an ongoing process throughout the product lifecycle. This section addresses how to maintain compliance through product modifications, updates, and market surveillance.

When assessing changes to certified products, consider:

1. Does the change affect compliance with essential requirements?
2. Does the change invalidate previous test results?
3. Is the change within the scope of the original certification?
4. Does the change affect the validity of the Declaration of Conformity?

Minor changes typically include component substitutions with identical specifications, cosmetic modifications, or minor software updates that don’t affect core functionality. These generally require updated internal documentation but not recertification.

Major changes include those affecting RF characteristics, safety features, or fundamental operating parameters. These typically require re-assessment and updated certification documentation.

Post-market surveillance requirements include:

• Monitoring field performance and failure reports
• Tracking customer complaints related to compliance aspects
• Periodically reviewing regulatory updates that might affect compliance
• Maintaining communication with regulatory authorities

Establish a formal non-compliance handling procedure that includes immediate investigation, containment actions, root cause analysis, corrective measures, and regulatory notification when required.

For equipment operated internationally, manufacturers should be aware of requirements for temporary operating permits for short-term foreign operations, which may apply to aviation radio equipment used across borders.

Managing Software Updates and Their Impact on Certification

Software updates present unique challenges for maintaining certification compliance. Understanding when updates trigger recertification is critical for modern aviation radio equipment.

Software updates typically fall into three categories:

1. Minor updates: Bug fixes or minor improvements that don’t affect regulated functions
2. Significant updates: Functionality changes within the scope of original certification
3. Major updates: Changes that affect regulated functions or introduce new capabilities

Minor updates generally require internal documentation updates and version control but not recertification. Significant updates typically require review by the manufacturer’s compliance team and possibly notification to the Notified Body. Major updates almost always require partial or complete recertification.

Documentation requirements for software changes include:

• Detailed change description and purpose
• Impact analysis on regulated functions
• Verification and validation test results
• Updated risk assessment
• Version control information

Implement robust configuration management practices including:

• Unique version identification for each software release
• Traceability between software versions and hardware configurations
• Controlled distribution mechanisms for updates
• Verification procedures to confirm proper installation

For software-defined radios, special attention must be paid to ensuring that updates cannot modify radio parameters in ways that would violate spectrum usage regulations. Authentication mechanisms and parameter verification are typically required.

Cost Management and Project Planning for Certification

Certification costs and timelines can significantly impact product development and market entry. This section provides guidance on budgeting, timeline planning, and resource allocation for efficient certification management.

Typical certification cost components include:

For budget planning, include at least 20% contingency for unexpected testing or documentation requirements. First-time certifications typically cost 30-50% more than subsequent certifications of similar products.

Timeline expectations vary by certification path:

• Self-declaration route: 3-6 months from design completion
• Notified Body assessment: 6-9 months from design completion
• EASA certification: 9-18 months from design completion

Cost optimization strategies include:

• Thorough pre-compliance testing to reduce formal test failures
• Bundling multiple product variants in single test campaigns
• Using internal resources for documentation preparation
• Selecting Notified Bodies with aviation experience to reduce review cycles
• Considering mutual recognition agreements for international certifications

When deciding between in-house and outsourced certification activities, consider that documentation preparation and pre-compliance testing are often more cost-effective in-house, while formal testing and regulatory navigation typically benefit from expert external resources.

Certification Project Management Best Practices

Effective project management is essential for successful certification. This section outlines best practices for planning, executing, and monitoring certification projects to minimize delays and optimize resources.

Key certification project milestones include:

• Requirements analysis completion
• Test plan approval
• Pre-compliance testing completion
• Technical file preparation
• Formal test submission
• Test report receipt
• Notified Body application
• Certification receipt
• Declaration of Conformity signing

An effective certification team typically includes:

• Project manager with regulatory experience
• Technical lead familiar with applicable standards
• Documentation specialist
• Test coordination engineer
• Quality assurance representative
• Regulatory affairs specialist (for complex projects)

Risk management for certification projects should focus on:

• Identifying regulatory gaps early through comprehensive requirements analysis
• Monitoring regulatory changes throughout the project lifecycle
• Establishing contingency plans for test failures
• Building buffer time for regulatory review cycles
• Maintaining open communication with test labs and regulatory bodies

Communication strategy should include regular status meetings, formal documentation of all regulatory interactions, and clear escalation paths for certification obstacles.

Progress tracking tools should include certification-specific metrics such as requirements compliance percentage, test pass rate, and documentation completion status.

Troubleshooting Common Certification Challenges

Even well-planned certification projects can encounter obstacles. This section addresses common challenges in aviation radio equipment certification and provides practical solutions based on industry experience.

Challenge 1: Test Failures in EMC Testing

EMC issues are among the most common certification failures for aviation radio equipment. These often manifest as emissions exceeding limits or susceptibility to external interference.

Solution: Conduct thorough pre-compliance testing with near-field probes to identify emission sources. Implement progressive shielding improvements and retest until margins are adequate. For susceptibility issues, add filtering on sensitive circuits and ensure proper grounding throughout the design.

Case Example: A VHF communication radio failed emissions testing due to inadequate shielding between the power supply and RF stages. Adding internal compartmentalization and improving cable routing reduced emissions by 12dB, bringing the equipment into compliance.

Challenge 2: Documentation Deficiencies

Incomplete or inadequate technical documentation is a frequent cause of certification delays, even when the product itself meets requirements.

Solution: Implement a documentation checklist based on the specific requirements of applicable directives and standards. Have documentation reviewed by someone not involved in its preparation. Use traceability matrices to ensure all requirements are addressed in the documentation.

Case Example: A manufacturer’s technical file was rejected because test reports didn’t clearly reference which specific requirements of the standard were being tested. Creating a comprehensive requirements traceability matrix linking each test to specific standard clauses resolved the issue.

Challenge 3: Software Verification Issues

Inadequate software verification evidence is increasingly common as radio equipment becomes more software-dependent.

Solution: Implement structured software verification processes aligned with DO-178C principles, even for non-critical software. Document test coverage, requirements traceability, and configuration management processes thoroughly.

Case Example: A software-defined radio failed certification review because the manufacturer couldn’t demonstrate that unauthorized frequency modifications were prevented. Implementing cryptographic verification of firmware and documenting the security architecture resolved the concern.

Challenge 4: Conflicts Between EASA and CE Requirements

In some cases, requirements from EASA and CE marking may appear to conflict, particularly regarding environmental conditions or interference limits.

Solution: Create a consolidated requirements matrix that identifies potential conflicts early. Where true conflicts exist, design to meet the more stringent requirement and document the approach in the technical file.

Case Example: A navigation radio faced conflicting requirements for conducted emissions on power lines. By identifying this early, the manufacturer designed to meet the stricter EASA requirement, automatically satisfying the CE requirement as well.

Expert Strategies for Accelerating Certification

Time-to-market pressures often require accelerated certification processes. This section presents expert strategies for reducing certification timelines without compromising compliance.

1. Early regulatory engagement: Contact Notified Bodies and regulatory authorities during the design phase to identify potential issues before formal submission. This proactive approach can reduce review cycles by anticipating concerns.
2. Comprehensive pre-compliance testing: Invest in thorough pre-compliance testing that covers all applicable requirements. This reduces the risk of failures during formal testing, which can add months to the timeline.
3. Parallel processing workflows: Structure your certification project to allow parallel activities. For example, begin preparing documentation while testing is underway, and start EASA application processes while CE marking assessment is in progress.
4. Use of accredited test data: Where possible, use test data from previously certified products or standard modules. This strategy works particularly well for product variants or evolutionary designs.
5. Expert resource allocation: Assign specialists with specific certification experience to critical path activities. Their familiarity with requirements and processes can significantly reduce time spent on revisions and corrections.
6. Documentation templates and libraries: Develop and maintain standardized documentation templates that comply with regulatory requirements. This reduces documentation preparation time and improves consistency.
7. Regulatory monitoring service: Subscribe to regulatory update services to receive early notification of changing requirements, allowing proactive adaptation rather than reactive corrections.

Common time-wasting activities to avoid include preparing excessive documentation not required by standards, conducting unnecessary tests, and submitting applications before documentation is complete. These activities often result in rework that extends the timeline.

Future Trends in Aviation Radio Equipment Certification

The regulatory landscape for aviation radio equipment continues to evolve. Understanding emerging trends and upcoming changes is essential for future-proofing your compliance strategy.

Key regulatory developments on the horizon include:

• Cybersecurity requirements: Both EASA and the RED are introducing more stringent cybersecurity requirements for connected equipment. Future certifications will likely require formal security risk assessments and documented security controls.
• Digital certification processes: Regulatory authorities are gradually digitizing certification workflows, potentially reducing administrative time through electronic submissions and automated validation checks.
• Harmonization efforts: Work continues to better align EASA requirements with broader EU product regulations, potentially simplifying the dual-certification process in the future.
• Sustainability considerations: Emerging regulations are beginning to address product lifecycle environmental impacts, including energy efficiency, recyclability, and hazardous substance restrictions.
• Remote inspection and validation: Accelerated by recent global events, authorities are increasingly accepting remote audits and virtual inspections, potentially reducing certification timelines.

Emerging technologies presenting certification challenges include:

• Software-defined radios with dynamic spectrum allocation
• AI/ML integration in radio management systems
• Satellite-based communication networks for aviation
• Advanced spectrum sharing technologies
• Integrated communication, navigation, and surveillance systems

To prepare for future requirements, manufacturers should:

• Participate in industry standards development groups
• Maintain ongoing dialogue with regulatory authorities
• Design flexible compliance systems that can adapt to changing requirements
• Incorporate security and sustainability considerations into product development
• Invest in digital compliance management tools

Resource Directory for Aviation Radio Equipment Certification

This comprehensive resource directory provides quick access to official guidance, notified bodies, testing facilities, and professional assistance for aviation radio equipment certification.

Official Regulatory Resources:

• EASA Certification Specifications: https://www.easa.europa.eu/document-library/certification-specifications
• Radio Equipment Directive: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/electrical-engineering/red-directive_en
• EUROCAE Standards Catalog: https://eurocae.net/publications/catalogue/
• ETSI Harmonized Standards: https://www.etsi.org/standards/get-standards

Notified Bodies Specializing in Aviation Radio Equipment:

• TÜV SÜD Product Service GmbH
• Eurofins E&E CML Limited
• Dekra Testing and Certification S.A.U.
• CSA Group Bayern GmbH
• Element Materials Technology Rotterdam B.V.

Accredited Testing Laboratories with Aviation Experience:

• Element Materials Technology
• Intertek Aviation
• EMCC DR. RAŠEK GmbH & Co. KG
• Rohde & Schwarz Verification Test Center
• Nemko Group AS

Professional Associations and Industry Groups:

• ASD-STAN (Aerospace and Defence Industries Association of Europe)
• EUROCAE (European Organisation for Civil Aviation Equipment)
• AeroSpace and Defence Industries Association of Europe (ASD)
• RTCA (Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics)

Training Resources:

• BSI Training Academy (CE Marking courses)
• JAA Training Organisation (EASA Regulations)
• TÜV SÜD Academy (RED Directive Training)
• EUROCAE Training Courses

Regulatory Update Services:

• Compliance & Risks Regulatory Monitoring
• Quadrant Knowledge Solutions
• EASA Mailing List Service
• European Commission GROW Updates

TOP RATED WALKIE TALKIES

Photo	Model	Price
	Retevis RT628 Walkie Talkies for Kids,Toy Gifts for 6-12 Year Old Boys Girls,Kid Gifts Walkie Talkie for Adults Outdoor Camping Hiking(Silvery 1 Pair)	Check Price On Amazon
	Cobra ACXT545 Weather-Resistant Walkie Talkies - Rechargeable, 22 Channels, Long Range 28-Mile Two-Way Radio Set (2-Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT388 Walkie Talkies for Kids, Toys for 6 7 8 9 12 Year Old Boys, 22 Ch 2 Way Radio Backlit LCD Flashlight, Blue Walkie Talkies for Kids Gifts Christmas Stocking Stuffers(Blue, 2 Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Cobra RX680 Walkie Talkies (2-Pack) - Rugged & Splashproof Two Way Radios Long Range, IP54 Water Resistant Design, 60 Pre-Programmed Channels, Weather Alerts, Included Charging Dock (Black/Orange)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT22 Walkie Talkies, Mini 2 Way Radio Rechargeable, VOX Handsfree, Portable, Two-Way Radios Long Range with Earpiece, for Family Road Trip Camping Hiking Skiing(2 Pack, Black)	Check Price On Amazon
	Midland GXT1000VP4 GMRS Two-Way Radio (50-Channel, Long Range, 142 Privacy Codes, SOS, NOAA, Rechargeable Nickle Battery, Black/Silver, 2-Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT628 Walkie Talkies for Kids,Toys Gifts for 6-12 Years Old Boys Girls,Long Range 2 Way Radio 22CH VOX,Birthday Gift,Family Walkie Talkie for Camping Hiking Indoor Outdoor	Check Price On Amazon