Spectrum Usage Analysis: Comparing 25 kHz vs Narrow Band

Aviation radio communications face growing spectrum congestion challenges. The transition from traditional 25 kHz to narrow band (12.5 kHz and 8.33 kHz) channel spacing offers a solution by increasing available channels within the same frequency range. This comprehensive analysis examines technical differences, performance impacts, and implementation strategies to help aviation professionals make informed decisions about this critical transition.

Understanding Aviation Radio Spectrum Management Fundamentals

Aviation radio spectrum is a finite and increasingly congested resource that requires careful management to ensure safe, reliable communications. Before comparing 25 kHz and narrow band technologies, it’s essential to understand the fundamental principles that govern spectrum allocation and efficiency.

Photo	Popular Portable Walkie Talkies	Price
	Multifunctional Smart Wireless Ski Goggles with Walkie-Talkie, Replaceable Anti-Fog Lens, Music & Call, Real-Time AMOLED Display, Compatible with Most Helmets (G03 Blue, Multi-Button Remote)	Check Price On Amazon
	SINORISE Super Mini Walkie Talkies, Portable Two-Way Radios for Restaurants, Outdoor Sports, Retail Stores, Hospital & Travel – 3 Pack	Check Price On Amazon
	KOSPET Tank M4C Outdoor Smart Watch with GPS, 1.96" AMOLED Display, Built-in LED Flashlight & Walkie-Talkie, Long Battery Life, 50m Waterproof, Bluetooth Calls, 24/7 Heart Rate/Sleep Monitor	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT15 Walkie Talkies, Portable FRS Two Way Radios Rechargeable, Durable, Compact, VOX, Key Lock, Mini Walkie Talkies for Adults and Kids, School Family Outdoor Travel Camping Hiking (3 Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Rechargeable Walkie Talkies Toys for Kids: DIY Astronaut Walkie Talkies for Boys Christmas Birthday Gifts for 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Boy Walkie Talkie Outdoor Hiking Toy 2 Way Radio Camping Outdoor Game	Check Price On Amazon

The VHF aviation band occupies the 118-137 MHz range, providing crucial communication channels for air traffic control and aircraft operations. Channel spacing defines the frequency separation between adjacent communication channels. Traditionally, 25 kHz spacing has been the standard, but increased air traffic has created significant spectrum congestion in busy airspace regions.

Spectral efficiency refers to how effectively we use the available frequency spectrum. As aviation continues to grow globally, regulatory authorities including the FAA, ICAO, and EASA have prioritized improving spectral efficiency through narrower channel spacing. This approach allows more communication channels within the same frequency range without expanding the allocated spectrum.

The principle of adjacent channel rejection becomes increasingly important with narrower spacing, as it prevents signals from neighboring channels from causing interference. Proper spectrum management requires balancing channel capacity with signal quality and operational reliability.

The Evolution of Aviation Radio Channel Spacing: Historical Context

The transition from 25 kHz to narrow band channel spacing represents a significant evolution in aviation communications, driven by increasing demand and technological advancement.

Aviation VHF communications were standardized in the mid-20th century when air traffic volumes were significantly lower. The 25 kHz channel spacing established then provided adequate capacity for decades, with approximately 760 channels available across the aviation band.

By the 1990s, significant growth in air traffic, particularly in Europe and North America, began creating severe spectrum congestion. This prompted initial discussions about channel spacing reduction as a solution. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) formally recognized the need for narrowbanding in 1995, recommending the gradual transition to more efficient channel utilization.

Europe led implementation efforts, with mandatory 8.33 kHz spacing for flights above FL195 (19,500 feet) beginning in 1999. The requirements gradually expanded to lower altitudes over the following decades. The United States has implemented 25 kHz to 12.5 kHz narrowbanding in other radio services but maintained 25 kHz for aviation, creating different regional approaches to spectrum management.

Technical Comparison: 25 kHz vs 12.5 kHz vs 8.33 kHz Channel Spacing

The technical differences between 25 kHz and narrow band systems extend beyond simple numerical channel width. These differences impact multiple aspects of radio performance, from spectrum efficiency to audio quality and equipment requirements.

Spectrum efficiency is the primary technical advantage of narrowbanding. The 25 kHz standard provides approximately 760 channels across the aviation band. Reducing to 12.5 kHz doubles this capacity to 1520 channels, while 8.33 kHz spacing triples it to 2280 channels. This dramatic increase addresses congestion in high-traffic airspace regions.

Frequency stability requirements become more stringent with narrower channels. While 25 kHz systems typically require stability of ±5 ppm (parts per million), 8.33 kHz systems demand ±1 ppm or better to prevent drift into adjacent channels. This requires more precise oscillator components and temperature compensation in radio equipment.

Modulation characteristics also differ. All aviation VHF uses amplitude modulation (AM), but narrower channels require more precise modulation control. Maximum deviation limits are reduced proportionally with channel width to prevent adjacent channel interference. Audio frequency response is typically limited to 300-2700 Hz for 25 kHz, but may be further restricted in narrower channels.

Guard bands, small frequency buffers between channels, play a crucial role in preventing interference. With narrower channels, these guard bands are proportionally reduced, requiring better filtering and more precise frequency control in radio equipment.

Spectrum Efficiency Calculations and Metrics

Spectrum efficiency is quantified through specific metrics that allow for objective comparison between different channel spacing approaches. Understanding these calculations provides insight into the substantial capacity gains achieved through narrowbanding.

The basic formula for calculating available channels in a frequency range is:

Number of channels = (Upper frequency limit – Lower frequency limit) ÷ Channel spacing

For the aviation VHF band (118-137 MHz):

• 25 kHz spacing: (137 – 118) MHz ÷ 0.025 MHz = 760 channels
• 12.5 kHz spacing: (137 – 118) MHz ÷ 0.0125 MHz = 1520 channels
• 8.33 kHz spacing: (137 – 118) MHz ÷ 0.00833 MHz = 2280 channels

This represents a 100% increase in channel capacity when moving from 25 kHz to 12.5 kHz, and a 200% increase when moving to 8.33 kHz spacing. In practical terms, this means that heavily congested regions like Europe can accommodate three times more simultaneous communications within the same frequency range.

The channel capacity increase is crucial for high-traffic areas. For example, a busy terminal area might require 50 separate frequencies for approach, departure, ground, and clearance communications. With 25 kHz spacing, this represents 6.6% of the total available spectrum. With 8.33 kHz spacing, the same operational requirements consume only 2.2% of available channels.

Performance Impact Analysis: How Narrow Band Affects Communications

The transition to narrow band channels inevitably affects radio system performance across multiple parameters. Understanding these impacts is crucial for operational planning and managing stakeholder expectations.

Audio quality is one of the most noticeable differences between 25 kHz and narrow band systems. The signal-to-noise ratio typically decreases as channel bandwidth narrows. Laboratory measurements show that 25 kHz channels generally provide a 2-3 dB better signal-to-noise ratio than 8.33 kHz channels under identical conditions. This difference becomes more pronounced in weaker signal conditions.

Range performance remains largely unaffected by channel spacing when using properly designed equipment. The fundamental physics of radio propagation depend primarily on transmitter power, antenna characteristics, and terrain rather than channel width. However, the reduced signal-to-noise ratio in narrow band systems can slightly reduce effective range at the margins, particularly in areas with high background noise.

Interference susceptibility shows mixed results. Narrow band systems are more vulnerable to on-channel interference but better at rejecting adjacent channel interference. Studies conducted by Eurocontrol found that 8.33 kHz systems rejected adjacent channel interference 3-5 dB better than 25 kHz systems, but were approximately 2 dB more susceptible to co-channel interference.

Equipment sensitivity requirements increase with narrower channels. Typical 25 kHz receivers require sensitivity of 2-3 μV for 12 dB SINAD (Signal to Noise and Distortion ratio), while 8.33 kHz systems typically require 1-2 μV for the same performance level.

Voice intelligibility in challenging environments provides the most significant operational difference. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Annex 10 compliance standards require minimum intelligibility of 85% for all aviation communication systems. Testing has shown that 25 kHz systems typically achieve 90-95% intelligibility in ideal conditions, while 8.33 kHz systems achieve 87-92%. This difference becomes more pronounced in high-noise cockpit environments or when communicating with non-native English speakers.

Audio Quality and Intelligibility Considerations

Voice intelligibility is paramount in aviation communications. Narrower channel spacing affects audio quality in specific ways that operators must understand and account for in their implementation planning.

The reduced bandwidth of narrow band channels directly impacts audio frequency response. While 25 kHz channels typically transmit audio frequencies from 300 Hz to 2700 Hz, 8.33 kHz channels may limit the upper range to 2500 Hz. This subtle difference affects the reproduction of consonant sounds, which contain higher-frequency components critical for speech intelligibility.

Articulation Index (AI), an objective measure of speech intelligibility, shows measurable differences between channel spacings. Under laboratory conditions, typical articulation index scores are:

• 25 kHz channels: AI of 0.56-0.62
• 12.5 kHz channels: AI of 0.53-0.58
• 8.33 kHz channels: AI of 0.50-0.55

These differences are most noticeable in challenging acoustic environments. Cockpit noise, particularly in older aircraft or during turbulent conditions, can mask critical parts of speech. Testing by the FAA Technical Center found that intelligibility in high-noise environments (85 dB ambient noise) decreased by 4-7% when using 8.33 kHz versus 25 kHz systems.

Several techniques can optimize audio quality in narrow band systems:

• Pre-emphasis and de-emphasis filtering to prioritize critical speech frequencies
• Advanced noise cancellation microphones for transmission
• Adaptive audio processing in receivers
• More stringent audio level standardization

Pilot and controller feedback from European implementations indicates initial concerns about audio quality that diminished with familiarity and improved equipment. Most operators report acceptable performance after adjustment periods, though they note increased importance of proper radio technique and clear enunciation.

Regulatory Framework and Compliance Requirements

The transition to narrow band aviation communications is governed by specific regulatory requirements that vary by region and airspace classification. Understanding these requirements is essential for compliance planning.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approach differs from international standards. While the FAA has implemented narrowbanding in land mobile radio services, it has maintained 25 kHz spacing for aviation VHF. The FAA’s NextGen program focuses on data link communications rather than voice channel narrowbanding as the primary spectrum efficiency strategy.

ICAO standards have progressively moved toward 8.33 kHz as the international standard. Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation now specifies 8.33 kHz as the standard channel spacing, though with provisions for regional variations based on implementation timelines.

European regulations through the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and Eurocontrol have established the most comprehensive narrowbanding requirements. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012 established the 25 kHz migration timeline with specific regional implementation schedules.

Key European deadlines included:

• January 1, 1999: 8.33 kHz for aircraft operating above FL245
• March 15, 2007: 8.33 kHz for aircraft operating above FL195
• January 1, 2014: 8.33 kHz for aircraft operating above FL095
• January 1, 2018: 8.33 kHz for all IFR flights in European airspace

Certification requirements vary by equipment type and region. In Europe, radio equipment must comply with ETSI standard EN 300 676 for ground stations and ETSI EN 301 688 for airborne equipment. These standards specify technical parameters including frequency stability, spurious emissions, and modulation characteristics.

Exemptions exist for certain operations, including state aircraft, aircraft museums, and specific humanitarian operations. However, these exemptions are limited and typically require prior coordination with air traffic control.

Implementation Strategy: Transitioning from 25 kHz to Narrow Band

Transitioning to narrow band aviation communications requires careful planning and execution. This section provides a structured approach to implementation that minimizes operational disruption and optimizes resource allocation.

A comprehensive implementation roadmap typically includes these phases:

1. Assessment Phase: Inventory all radio equipment, determine compliance status
2. Planning Phase: Develop timeline, budget, and technical specifications
3. Procurement Phase: Acquire compliant equipment or upgrade kits
4. Installation Phase: Implement new equipment with minimal operational disruption
5. Testing Phase: Verify performance and compliance
6. Training Phase: Ensure all personnel are prepared for operational differences
7. Operational Phase: Monitor performance and address any issues

Fleet assessment should document each radio model, firmware version, upgrade capability, and remaining service life. For large operators, a database-driven inventory management approach is recommended to track compliance status across the fleet.

The decision between upgrading existing equipment versus replacement depends on several factors:

• Equipment age and remaining service life
• Availability of manufacturer upgrade kits
• Cost comparison between upgrade and replacement
• Additional capabilities of new equipment
• Installation complexity and downtime requirements

Budget planning must account for direct equipment costs, installation labor, certification expenses, training, and operational impact during transition. For a typical 50-aircraft fleet, transition costs range from $250,000 to $1 million depending on existing equipment types and approach taken.

Testing protocols should verify both technical compliance and operational performance. Key parameters to test include frequency accuracy, adjacent channel rejection, audio quality in various environments, and interoperability with ground stations.

Risk management considerations include scheduling transitions during lower-traffic periods, maintaining some dual-capability aircraft during transition, and establishing contingency procedures for any implementation issues.

Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework for Narrow Band Transition

The financial implications of transitioning to narrow band communications must be carefully analyzed against the operational benefits and regulatory requirements. This framework provides a structured approach to cost-benefit analysis.

Comprehensive cost components include:

• Equipment costs: $3,000-$15,000 per aircraft depending on complexity
• Installation labor: 4-16 hours per aircraft at $75-$150 per hour
• Certification expenses: $1,000-$5,000 per aircraft type
• Training costs: $200-$500 per pilot/technician
• Operational impact: Aircraft downtime during installation
• Documentation updates: Manuals, procedures, and records

For calculating direct implementation costs, use this formula:

Total Cost = (Equipment Cost + Installation Labor + Certification) × Number of Aircraft + Training × Number of Personnel + Documentation + Contingency

Long-term benefits to quantify include:

• Regulatory compliance (avoiding potential penalties)
• Improved access to congested airspace
• Reduced communication delays in high-traffic areas
• Future-proofing against additional regulatory requirements
• Potential for enhanced capabilities in newer equipment

Return on investment timeframes vary significantly by operation type. Commercial operators in congested European airspace typically see operational benefits within 1-2 years, while operators in less congested regions may only realize return through regulatory compliance.

Cost mitigation strategies include phased implementation aligned with scheduled maintenance, bulk equipment purchases, and coordination with similar operators to share certification costs for common aircraft types.

Equipment and Technology Considerations

Selecting the appropriate radio equipment for narrow band operations involves understanding specific technical requirements, compatibility considerations, and future-proofing options.

Technical specifications for narrow band compliance include:

• Frequency stability: ±1 ppm or better
• Adjacent channel rejection: 60+ dB
• Receiver sensitivity: 1-2 μV for 12 dB SINAD
• Audio frequency response: 300-2500 Hz (±3 dB)
• Spurious emissions: -70 dB or less
• Channel selection capability: Must support 8.33 kHz channel designation format

Major aviation radio manufacturers including Garmin, Collins Aerospace, Honeywell, Becker, and Trig Avionics offer narrow band compliant equipment. Selection factors should include compatibility with existing avionics, support for future upgrades, warranty terms, and global service availability.

Legacy equipment upgrade possibilities vary significantly by manufacturer and model. Approximately 60% of digital radios manufactured after 2005 can be upgraded through software or minor hardware modifications. Older equipment typically requires replacement. Each manufacturer maintains a compatibility database for their equipment.

Integration considerations include physical interface compatibility, audio panel integration, antenna systems, and control head functionality. Particular attention should be paid to ensuring that control systems properly display 8.33 kHz channel designations, which use a different format than 25 kHz channels.

Multi-mode equipment capable of operating in both 25 kHz and narrow band modes offers significant advantages during transition periods and for aircraft operating across different regions. While slightly more expensive, these systems provide maximum operational flexibility.

Future compatibility considerations should include:

• Support for VHF Data Link (VDL) modes
• Software upgrade capability for future standards
• Integration with digital audio systems
• Support for networked avionics architectures

Testing and Validation Methodologies for Narrow Band Systems

Ensuring the proper performance of narrow band radio systems requires rigorous testing and validation. This section outlines the methodologies and protocols for verifying system performance.

Pre-implementation testing should include bench testing of equipment before installation to verify:

• Frequency accuracy across temperature range
• Output power and modulation characteristics
• Receiver sensitivity and selectivity
• Channel selection functionality for 8.33 kHz designations

Ground testing after installation should verify:

• Proper integration with aircraft systems
• Absence of electromagnetic interference
• Transmission and reception quality with ground stations
• Proper operation of all controls and displays
• Audio quality in cockpit environment

Flight testing protocols should include:

• Communication range verification at different altitudes
• Performance in various flight conditions (climb, cruise, approach)
• Operational workflow assessment
• Audio quality assessment under realistic cockpit noise conditions

Acceptable performance criteria typically include:

• Reliable communications at ranges appropriate for the operation type
• Clear audio with 85% or greater intelligibility under all conditions
• No interference with other aircraft systems
• Proper functionality of all controls and displays

Documentation requirements for certification include test reports, equipment configuration records, and performance verification data. Most authorities require retention of these records for the life of the installation.

Training and Operational Considerations

The human element is critical in successful narrow band implementation. Proper training and updated operational procedures ensure that technical improvements translate to operational benefits.

Different personnel require specific training approaches:

• Pilots: Focus on channel selection procedures, audio quality expectations, and optimal radio technique
• Maintenance Technicians: Equipment specifications, troubleshooting procedures, and testing protocols
• Dispatchers/Operations: Updated flight planning considering regional requirements

Communication procedure adjustments for narrow band operations include:

• More precise enunciation of critical information
• Proper microphone technique becomes more important
• Standardized phraseology to reduce ambiguity
• Awareness of different channel display formats

Best practices for radio discipline in narrow band environments include:

• Maintaining optimal transmission volume levels
• Avoiding transmission in high-noise conditions when possible
• Using standard phraseology consistently
• Confirming unclear transmissions immediately
• Regular headset maintenance to ensure optimal audio quality

Common operational challenges include:

• Channel selection confusion during transition periods
• Varying audio characteristics between regions
• Increased workload in high-traffic areas
• Equipment variations across fleets

Training program structures should include both theoretical knowledge (classroom or online) and practical exercises. Simulator integration allows practice with narrow band communications before operational implementation. Recurrent training should address any issues identified during operational use.

Case Studies: Real-World Narrow Band Implementation Examples

Learning from organizations that have successfully implemented narrow band communications provides valuable insights and helps avoid common pitfalls. These case studies represent diverse aviation operations and implementation approaches.

Case Study 1: Major European Airline

A major European carrier with 150+ aircraft implemented 8.33 kHz across their fleet over 18 months. Their approach included:

• Phased implementation aligned with heavy maintenance checks
• Standardization on a single radio model across multiple aircraft types
• Development of a specialized training program for pilots and technicians
• Initial implementation on short-haul fleet, followed by long-haul

Challenges included initial pilot reports of audio quality concerns and some maintenance complexity. These were addressed through additional training and audio system optimization. Total implementation cost was approximately €3.2 million, with minimal operational disruption due to alignment with scheduled maintenance.

The airline reported improved communications in congested terminal areas and reduced delays related to frequency congestion after implementation was complete.

Case Study 2: Regional Business Aviation Operator

A business aviation operator with 12 aircraft based in central Europe implemented 8.33 kHz capabilities as part of a broader avionics upgrade. Their approach included:

• Complete radio system replacement with integrated navigation/communication systems
• Implementation during scheduled refurbishment program
• Dual-band capability maintained for operations outside Europe
• Combined implementation with ADS-B and other mandated upgrades

By combining multiple regulatory compliance upgrades, the operator optimized downtime and reduced total implementation costs. The project was completed in 9 months at a cost of approximately €680,000 for all upgrades combined.

Operators reported improved access to preferred routes in congested European airspace and reduced communication congestion in terminal areas. The integrated approach resulted in modernized cockpits with improved workflow.

Case Study 3: Government Air Survey Operation

A government environmental monitoring agency operating 5 specialized aircraft implemented narrow band communications as part of a fleet standardization program. Their approach focused on:

• Selection of software-defined radio systems with future upgrade capability
• Development of standardized installation packages for diverse aircraft types
• Integration with existing specialized mission equipment
• Cross-training of maintenance personnel

The operation completed implementation in 6 months at a cost of approximately $240,000. By selecting software-defined radios, they established a platform for future communications capabilities without additional hardware changes.

The operation reported improved reliability and reduced maintenance requirements after standardizing on modern equipment. Operational flexibility improved with the ability to operate in all European airspace without restrictions.

Future Spectrum Management Trends and Technologies

The evolution of aviation radio communications will continue beyond current narrow band implementations. Understanding emerging technologies and spectrum management approaches provides context for long-term planning.

Digital modulation technologies represent the next major evolution in aviation communications. Unlike the current amplitude modulation approach, digital systems offer significantly improved spectral efficiency, audio quality, and data capabilities. Standards under development include:

• VHF Digital Link (VDL) modes for combined voice/data
• Digital Voice for Aviation (DVA) protocols
• Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) systems for channel sharing

Integrated voice/data communication systems will likely replace separate voice and datalink systems in the next decade. These integrated approaches allow dynamic allocation of spectrum between voice and data based on operational needs, further improving spectrum utilization.

Software-defined radio (SDR) technology is increasingly important for future-proofing communications systems. SDR architecture allows fundamental radio characteristics to be modified through software updates rather than hardware changes, potentially enabling adaptation to new standards without equipment replacement.

International harmonization efforts continue through ICAO working groups focused on creating globally compatible spectrum utilization plans. These efforts aim to reduce regional variations that complicate equipment requirements and operational procedures for international operators.

Satellite-based alternatives including Iridium Next and Inmarsat SwiftBroadband Safety (SB-S) offer supplementary communication paths that can reduce VHF congestion for certain types of communications. These systems are increasingly integrated with traditional VHF in modern communications management units.

The timeline for future technology implementation suggests that digital voice standards will begin deployment in the 2025-2030 timeframe, with full implementation extending into the 2030s. Current narrow band implementations will remain operational throughout this period, with gradual transition to digital technologies.

Conclusion and Implementation Checklist

The transition from 25 kHz to narrow band aviation radio communications represents a significant but necessary evolution in spectrum management. This concluding section summarizes key considerations and provides a comprehensive implementation checklist.

Narrow band implementation delivers substantial spectrum efficiency improvements, with 8.33 kHz spacing providing three times the channel capacity of traditional 25 kHz systems. While these systems involve certain performance tradeoffs, particularly in audio quality, properly implemented narrow band systems meet all operational requirements for aviation safety and efficiency.

Implementation planning should address technical, operational, and human factors aspects of the transition. The most successful implementations integrate narrow band adoption with other avionics upgrades to optimize costs and minimize operational disruption.

Implementation checklist by phase:

Assessment Phase:

• Complete inventory of all radio equipment
• Determine compliance status of each unit
• Identify upgrade vs. replacement candidates
• Review applicable regulatory requirements and deadlines

Planning Phase:

• Develop implementation timeline aligned with operations
• Create detailed budget with contingencies
• Select equipment and/or upgrade paths
• Plan certification approach

Implementation Phase:

• Procure equipment and/or upgrade kits
• Develop installation procedures and documentation
• Train maintenance personnel
• Execute installations according to schedule
• Perform required testing and validation

Operational Phase:

• Train operational personnel
• Update operational manuals and procedures
• Implement monitoring program to identify any issues
• Review and optimize based on operational experience

For operators beginning this transition, resources available include equipment manufacturers’ technical support, aviation authority guidance materials, and industry association implementation guides. Regulatory authorities in each region maintain specific compliance information and can provide guidance on regional requirements and timelines.

Photo	TOP RATED WALKIE TALKIES	Price
	Retevis RT628 Walkie Talkies for Kids,Toy Gifts for 6-12 Year Old Boys Girls,Kid Gifts Walkie Talkie for Adults Outdoor Camping Hiking(Silvery 1 Pair)	Check Price On Amazon
	Cobra ACXT545 Weather-Resistant Walkie Talkies - Rechargeable, 22 Channels, Long Range 28-Mile Two-Way Radio Set (2-Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT388 Walkie Talkies for Kids, Toys for 6 7 8 9 12 Year Old Boys, 22 CH 2 Way Radio Backlit LCD Flashlight, Blue Walkie Talkies for Boys Gifts Easter Basket Stuffers(Blue, 2 Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Cobra RX680 Walkie Talkies (2-Pack) - Rugged & Splashproof Two Way Radios Long Range, IP54 Water Resistant Design, 60 Pre-Programmed Channels, Weather Alerts, Included Charging Dock (Black/Orange)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT22 Walkie Talkies, Mini 2 Way Radio Rechargeable, VOX Handsfree, Portable, Two-Way Radios Long Range with Earpiece, for Family Road Trip Camping Hiking Skiing(2 Pack, Black)	Check Price On Amazon
	Midland GXT1000VP4 GMRS Two-Way Radio (50 Channel, Long Range, 142 Privacy Codes, SOS, NOAA, Rechargeable Nickel Battery, Black/Silver 2-Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT628 Walkie Talkies for Kids,Toys Gifts for 6-12 Years Old Boys Girls,Long Range 2 Way Radio 22CH VOX,Birthday Gift,Family Walkie Talkie for Camping Hiking Indoor Outdoor	Check Price On Amazon