Type Acceptance Testing: Certification Process Explained

Type Acceptance Testing is a rigorous certification process that verifies aviation radio equipment meets regulatory standards before use. This guide explains the complete certification journey from application to approval, outlining technical requirements and compliance procedures. You’ll learn how to navigate complex regulations, avoid common pitfalls, and maintain certification compliance for your aviation radio equipment.

Understanding Aviation Radio Certification Types

Aviation radio equipment certification falls into several distinct categories, each with specific requirements and applications. Understanding which certification pathway applies to your equipment is the crucial first step in the process.

Photo	Popular Portable Walkie Talkies	Price
	Multifunctional Smart Wireless Ski Goggles with Walkie-Talkie, Replaceable Anti-Fog Lens, Music & Call, Real-Time AMOLED Display, Compatible with Most Helmets (G03 Blue, Multi-Button Remote)	Check Price On Amazon
	SINORISE Super Mini Walkie Talkies, Portable Two-Way Radios for Restaurants, Outdoor Sports, Retail Stores, Hospital & Travel – 3 Pack	Check Price On Amazon
	KOSPET Tank M4C Outdoor Smart Watch with GPS, 1.96" AMOLED Display, Built-in LED Flashlight & Walkie-Talkie, Long Battery Life, 50m Waterproof, Bluetooth Calls, 24/7 Heart Rate/Sleep Monitor	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT15 Walkie Talkies, Portable FRS Two Way Radios Rechargeable, Durable, Compact, VOX, Key Lock, Mini Walkie Talkies for Adults and Kids, School Family Outdoor Travel Camping Hiking (3 Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Rechargeable Walkie Talkies Toys for Kids: DIY Astronaut Walkie Talkies for Boys Christmas Birthday Gifts for 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Boy Walkie Talkie Outdoor Hiking Toy 2 Way Radio Camping Outdoor Game	Check Price On Amazon

Radio certification types include Type Certificate (TC), Type Acceptance Certificate (TAC), Supplemental Type Certificate (STC), Technical Standard Order (TSO), and Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA). Each serves a different purpose in the regulatory framework.

A Type Certificate (TC) is the foundation for aircraft certification, confirming the aircraft design meets applicable airworthiness requirements. For radio equipment specifically, manufacturers typically pursue TSO authorization, which certifies that a component meets minimum performance standards.

The Type Acceptance Certificate (TAC) is particularly important for equipment manufactured in one country but used in another. This certificate acknowledges that equipment certified by a foreign authority meets domestic requirements. The type approval process for international certification varies between regulatory bodies but follows similar fundamental principles.

Supplemental Type Certificates (STCs) apply when modifying existing certified equipment or installing approved equipment in certified aircraft. This pathway is common for aftermarket radio installations.

Type Acceptance vs. Type Certification: Key Differences

The terms “type acceptance” and “type certification” are often confused but represent fundamentally different regulatory processes with important distinctions for aviation radio equipment.

Type certification is the comprehensive process of proving an aircraft design meets all applicable airworthiness requirements. It involves extensive testing, analysis, and documentation. Type acceptance, however, is a validation process where one authority recognizes certification granted by another authority.

Key differences include:

• Regulatory basis: Type certification references 14 CFR Part 21 Subpart B, while type acceptance falls under Subpart N
• Testing requirements: Type certification requires complete testing, while type acceptance may accept existing test data
• Cost implications: Type acceptance typically costs significantly less than full type certification
• Timeline: Type acceptance generally processes faster (3-6 months vs. 1-3 years for certification)

For radio manufacturers, understanding these distinctions helps determine the appropriate certification pathway for equipment, potentially saving considerable time and resources.

The Step-by-Step Type Acceptance Testing Process for Aviation Radios

The aviation radio certification process follows a structured sequence of steps, each with specific requirements and deliverables. Following this roadmap will help navigate the complex certification journey efficiently.

1. Initial Assessment: Determine applicable regulations and standards (2-4 weeks)
2. Application Submission: Prepare and submit formal application with technical data (1-2 weeks)
3. Documentation Review: Authority reviews application completeness (4-8 weeks)
4. Technical Testing: Conduct required performance and environmental tests (8-16 weeks)
5. Compliance Verification: Demonstrate compliance with applicable standards (4-6 weeks)
6. Regulatory Review: Authority evaluates test results and compliance data (6-12 weeks)
7. Certificate Issuance: Approval granted for compliant equipment (2-4 weeks)

The entire process typically takes 6-12 months, though complex equipment or novel technologies may require additional time. International certifications can extend this timeline further.

Initial Application and Documentation Requirements

The certification journey begins with proper application preparation and submission. The quality and completeness of your initial documentation package can significantly impact approval timelines.

Required application forms include:

• FAA Form 8110-12 (Application for Type Certificate, Production Certificate, or STC)
• FAA Form 8130-6 (Application for Airworthiness Certificate) when applicable
• EASA Form 33 for European certification

Supporting documentation must include:

• Technical data package describing equipment design and operation
• Compliance checklist identifying applicable regulations
• Test plans detailing methods for demonstrating compliance
• Quality system documentation ensuring production consistency
• Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA)

Common documentation errors that cause delays include incomplete compliance checklists, inadequate test plans, and missing technical specifications. Ensuring documentation completeness before submission can significantly reduce review cycles and expedite the process.

Technical Testing Requirements for Aviation Radios

Aviation radio equipment must undergo rigorous technical testing to verify performance, reliability, and safety. These tests form the core of the certification process and require careful preparation.

Performance testing requirements include:

• Frequency accuracy (±0.0005% tolerance typical)
• Power output (measured in watts, with specific limits by radio type)
• Receiver sensitivity (typically -107 dBm for VHF)
• Selectivity (adjacent channel rejection of 60+ dB)
• Audio quality (intelligibility testing)

Environmental testing follows RTCA DO-160 standards, including:

• Temperature variation (-55°C to +70°C for airborne equipment)
• Altitude operation (up to 55,000 feet for certain installations)
• Humidity resistance (95% relative humidity)
• Vibration tolerance (specific to installation location)
• Electromagnetic interference (EMI) compatibility

Test results must be documented with precise measurements, test conditions, equipment used, and traceability to calibrated instruments. Radio check procedures for getting useful feedback during testing help identify potential issues before formal certification testing.

Compliance Demonstration and Verification

Once technical testing is complete, manufacturers must demonstrate that their radio equipment meets all applicable standards and requirements through a structured compliance verification process.

The cornerstone of this phase is developing a comprehensive compliance matrix that maps each regulatory requirement to specific evidence of compliance. This matrix typically includes:

• Regulatory requirement reference (specific paragraph)
• Method of compliance (test, analysis, inspection, or similarity)
• Evidence document (test report, analysis report, drawings)
• Compliance status (compliant, partially compliant, non-compliant)

Test reports must follow a standardized format including:

• Clear identification of the item tested
• Test procedures with acceptance criteria
• Actual results with measured values
• Pass/fail determination
• Authorized signatures and dates

The final Declaration of Compliance must be signed by an authorized representative, confirming all requirements have been met and all documentation is complete and accurate.

Final Review and Certificate Issuance

The final phase of the certification process involves regulatory review of all submitted documentation and test results, followed by certificate issuance for compliant equipment.

Regulatory authorities conduct a comprehensive review that typically takes 6-12 weeks, examining:

• Completeness of technical data
• Validity of test methods and results
• Appropriateness of compliance findings
• Quality system adequacy

Review outcomes include approval, conditional approval (with specific limitations), or rejection (requiring remediation and resubmission). For approved equipment, authorities issue a formal certificate identifying:

• Equipment manufacturer and model
• Applicable regulatory basis
• Operational limitations if any
• Certificate expiration or renewal requirements

After certification, manufacturers must maintain all technical documentation, report service difficulties, and obtain approval for significant changes to ensure continued compliance.

Technical Standards for Aviation Radio Certification

Aviation radio equipment must comply with specific technical standards that govern performance, reliability, and compatibility. These standards form the basis for certification testing and compliance verification.

Key standards include:

• RTCA DO-160: Environmental Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment
• RTCA DO-178C: Software Considerations in Airborne Systems
• RTCA DO-254: Design Assurance Guidance for Airborne Electronic Hardware
• TSO-C169a: VHF Radio Communications Transceiver Equipment
• TSO-C128a: Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) Equipment

International standards include ICAO Annex 10 (Aeronautical Telecommunications) and EUROCAE documents that parallel RTCA standards. These standards specify minimum performance requirements for different radio types, including:

• VHF communications radios (118.000-136.975 MHz)
• HF communications equipment (2-30 MHz)
• Emergency locator transmitters (121.5/406 MHz)
• Navigation receivers (VOR, ILS, GPS)

Manufacturers must identify all applicable standards for their specific equipment type and demonstrate compliance with each requirement. Military frequency restrictions create additional considerations for dual-use radio equipment that might operate on both civilian and military bands.

Frequency and Performance Testing Requirements

Radio frequency performance testing forms the core of aviation radio certification, ensuring equipment operates correctly across all intended operational parameters.

Frequency testing requirements include:

• Frequency stability: Typically ±0.0005% (5 ppm) over full temperature range
• Channel spacing compliance: 8.33 kHz or 25 kHz depending on region
• Spurious emissions: Less than -36 dBm outside operating band
• Modulation characteristics: AM depth 85% ±5% for voice communications

Transmitter performance requirements include:

• Power output: Typically 5-10W for VHF airborne equipment
• Carrier noise level: At least 35 dB below carrier level
• Harmonic suppression: At least 40 dB below carrier level

Receiver performance requirements include:

• Sensitivity: Typically -107 dBm for 6 dB S+N/N
• Selectivity: Adjacent channel rejection of at least 60 dB
• Blocking: Immunity to strong signals ±50 kHz from desired frequency
• Intermodulation: At least 70 dB rejection

Test equipment for these measurements must be calibrated and traceable to national standards. Specialized instruments include signal generators, spectrum analyzers, power meters, and audio analyzers.

Environmental and Reliability Testing

Aviation radio equipment must perform reliably in challenging environmental conditions. Environmental testing verifies operation across temperature extremes, altitude changes, humidity variations, and mechanical stresses.

RTCA DO-160 defines comprehensive environmental test procedures including:

• Temperature and Altitude (Section 4): Operating from -55°C to +70°C and up to 55,000 feet
• Temperature Variation (Section 5): Rapid temperature changes of 10°C per minute
• Humidity (Section 6): 95% relative humidity at elevated temperatures
• Shock and Crash Safety (Section 7): Impact resistance verification
• Vibration (Section 8): Sinusoidal and random vibration profiles
• Waterproofness (Section 10): Various levels based on installation location

Equipment is categorized by intended installation location (cockpit, unpressurized areas, external mounts), which determines the specific test levels required. Water resistance ratings like IPX7 and IPX4 are particularly important for radios that might be exposed to precipitation or condensation.

Reliability testing includes accelerated life testing and MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) verification. Typical aviation radios must demonstrate MTBF values of 5,000-10,000 hours through statistical analysis and testing.

Software Certification Considerations for Modern Aviation Radios

Modern aviation radios increasingly rely on software for critical functions, introducing additional certification requirements that must be addressed alongside hardware testing.

RTCA DO-178C provides the framework for aviation software certification, categorizing software by its potential impact on safety:

• Level A: Software whose failure could cause catastrophic failure
• Level B: Software whose failure could cause hazardous/severe failure
• Level C: Software whose failure could cause major failure
• Level D: Software whose failure could cause minor failure
• Level E: Software with no safety impact

For most communication radios, software typically falls into Level C or D, though navigation radios may require Level B. Each level has specific verification requirements:

Software development for certified radios must follow a structured process including:

• Requirements development and management
• Design documentation and review
• Coding standards and reviews
• Verification testing (requirements-based, structural coverage)
• Configuration management and traceability

Software updates to certified equipment require careful management, as any change could potentially affect certification status. Minor updates may qualify for streamlined approval, while significant changes may require recertification.

International Certification and Reciprocity

Aviation radio equipment often requires certification by multiple international authorities. Understanding the similarities, differences, and reciprocity agreements between regulatory bodies can streamline the global certification process.

Major aviation authorities include:

• Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) – United States
• European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) – Europe
• Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) – Canada
• Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) – China
• Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) – Australia

While technical standards are largely harmonized through organizations like ICAO, certification processes and documentation requirements can vary significantly. For example, EASA typically requires more upfront documentation, while the FAA often emphasizes testing verification.

Import-export documentation for international equipment movement adds another layer of complexity when shipping certified radio equipment across borders, requiring additional permits and customs declarations.

Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreements (BASAs) facilitate mutual recognition of certifications between certain authorities. The most comprehensive agreement exists between the FAA and EASA, allowing streamlined validation of each other’s approvals.

Reciprocal Certification Agreements and Validation Processes

Reciprocal certification agreements between aviation authorities can significantly streamline the international approval process for radio equipment, though important differences and validation requirements remain.

The validation process typically involves:

1. Application to the validating authority with original certification documentation
2. Technical familiarization by the validating authority
3. Identification of certification basis differences
4. Resolution of any significant regulatory differences
5. Issuance of validation certificate

Validation timelines vary significantly:

Technical requirements are generally consistent across jurisdictions, though administrative processes differ substantially. Working with consultants familiar with specific authorities can significantly expedite validation processes, especially for complex equipment.

Common Challenges and Solutions in Radio Certification

The aviation radio certification process presents several common challenges that can delay approval or increase costs. Understanding these potential obstacles and their solutions can help navigate the process more efficiently.

Challenge 1: Test Failures
Radio equipment commonly fails environmental or performance tests during initial submission. This typically occurs with temperature extremes, vibration tolerance, or EMI compatibility.
Solution: Conduct pre-compliance testing early in development. Build adequate margins into designs (e.g., if requirement is ±5 ppm frequency stability, design for ±3 ppm). Document failures thoroughly with root cause analysis and corrective actions.

Challenge 2: Documentation Inadequacies
Incomplete or improperly structured technical documentation is the most common reason for certification delays.
Solution: Create documentation templates aligned with authority expectations. Have documentation reviewed by certification specialists before submission. Use checklists to ensure completeness.

Challenge 3: Regulatory Interpretation Differences
Different authorities or even different reviewers may interpret requirements differently.
Solution: Request pre-submission meetings to clarify expectations. Document all discussions with authorities. When uncertainty exists, provide multiple compliance approaches.

Challenge 4: Software Compliance Issues
Software development process evidence is frequently insufficient, particularly for DO-178C compliance.
Solution: Implement software development processes early that align with certification requirements. Maintain traceability from requirements through testing. Consider specialized tools for aviation software development.

Challenge 5: Post-Submission Information Requests
Authorities often request additional information during review, extending timelines.
Solution: Anticipate common requests based on past experience. Prepare supplementary information packages in advance. Respond promptly and completely to information requests.

Troubleshooting Test Failures and Non-Compliance

Technical test failures are a common part of the certification process. How these failures are addressed can significantly impact the certification timeline and outcome.

Case Example: Temperature Stability Failure
A VHF communication radio failed frequency stability requirements at -40°C, drifting beyond the allowed ±5 ppm tolerance.
Root Cause Analysis: Investigation revealed that the crystal oscillator lacked proper compensation at low temperatures.
Corrective Action: Engineers redesigned the oscillator circuit with improved temperature compensation and upgraded to a higher-specification crystal.
Documentation: The manufacturer submitted detailed test failure reports, design change documentation, and complete retest results showing compliance across the full temperature range.
Result: Certification proceeded with a three-month delay.

Case Example: EMI Susceptibility Issue
A radio showed unexpected behavior when exposed to specific RF fields during DO-160 testing.
Root Cause Analysis: Shielding design was inadequate around a specific circuit board area.
Corrective Action: Improved shielding was implemented, and filtering components were added to sensitive signal paths.
Documentation: Complete EMI scan results before and after modification were provided, along with design change documentation.
Result: Certification proceeded after limited retesting focused on the affected requirements.

When addressing test failures, authorities expect:

• Complete documentation of the failure conditions
• Thorough analysis identifying root causes
• Comprehensive corrective action implementation
• Evidence that the solution addresses all potential implications
• Verification testing confirming the effectiveness of changes

Cost and Timeline Considerations

The cost and timeline for aviation radio certification vary based on equipment complexity, testing requirements, and regulatory interactions. Understanding these variables enables better project planning and resource allocation.

Typical certification costs range from $50,000 for simple equipment with existing approvals to over $500,000 for complex new designs requiring multiple international certifications. These costs break down approximately as:

• Engineering and documentation preparation: 30-40%
• Testing and test equipment: 40-50%
• Regulatory fees and consultant costs: 10-20%

Timeline expectations vary by equipment type:

Factors that significantly impact cost and schedule include:

• Novel technology requiring special conditions
• Software complexity and required assurance level
• Number of certification authorities involved
• Testing failures requiring redesign
• Production volume expectations

Cost management strategies include phased certification approaches, using accredited third-party testing facilities, and leveraging existing approvals where possible.

Post-Certification Requirements and Compliance Maintenance

Obtaining certification is not the end of the regulatory process. Aviation radio manufacturers must maintain ongoing compliance and address several post-certification requirements.

Production approval requirements ensure that manufactured units consistently match the certified design:

• Quality system implementation (typically AS9100 or equivalent)
• Production test procedures for each unit
• Conformity inspection processes
• Component traceability systems

Record keeping obligations include:

• Design data retention (typically for the life of the product plus 3 years)
• Production records for each serial number
• Test reports for each manufactured unit
• Non-conformance documentation and resolution

Ongoing reporting requirements include:

• Service Difficulty Reports for field issues
• Safety condition reporting when defects affect safety
• Continued airworthiness support

Most certifications require periodic renewal or continued surveillance. The FAA typically conducts periodic audits rather than formal renewals, while EASA often requires formal renewal every 2-5 years depending on the product category.

Managing Changes and Modifications to Certified Equipment

Changes to certified radio equipment require careful management to maintain valid certification. Understanding which changes require regulatory approval and which can be implemented under existing approvals is essential.

Changes are classified as:

• Major Changes: Affect form, fit, function, or safety characteristics
  • Require formal approval before implementation
  • Need substantial documentation and possibly retesting
  • Examples: frequency range changes, new features, different components affecting performance
• Minor Changes: Do not significantly affect the approved design
  • Can typically be implemented under the manufacturer’s quality system
  • Require documentation but usually not pre-approval
  • Examples: component supplier changes, minor software bug fixes, documentation improvements

Software updates present special challenges, as even small code changes can have significant impacts. Generally:

• Bug fixes without functional changes may qualify as minor changes
• Feature additions or modifications typically require approval
• Changes affecting safety-related functions always require approval

The change classification decision process follows this sequence:

1. Document the proposed change completely
2. Assess impact on form, fit, function, and safety
3. Review against certification basis requirements
4. Determine testing needed to verify continued compliance
5. Classify as major or minor based on assessment

When in doubt, consulting with the certifying authority before implementing changes can prevent compliance issues and potential penalties.

Case Studies: Successful Aviation Radio Certification Projects

Examining real-world certification projects provides valuable insights into effective strategies, common pitfalls, and practical approaches to aviation radio certification.

Case Study 1: VHF Communication Radio Certification

A manufacturer developed a new 8.33 kHz VHF communication radio for the European market, targeting both airliners and general aviation.

Timeline Highlights:

• Initial planning and documentation: 3 months
• Technical testing and verification: 4 months
• EASA review and approval: 3 months
• FAA validation: 2 months

Key Challenges: The radio initially failed DO-160 lightning susceptibility testing. Redesign of input protection circuits was required. Software verification also revealed incomplete requirements traceability.

Success Factors: Early engagement with EASA for certification planning. Comprehensive test planning before certification testing. Two-phase approach separating hardware and software certification. Using experienced DO-178B consultants for software aspects.

Lessons Learned: Pre-compliance testing would have identified the lightning protection issue earlier. Software development processes should align with certification requirements from project inception.

Case Study 2: Multi-function GPS/Com Unit

A manufacturer developed an integrated GPS/Com radio with touchscreen interface for general aviation, requiring simultaneous navigation and communication certification.

Timeline Highlights:

• Requirements and planning: 4 months
• Hardware development and testing: 6 months
• Software development and verification: 8 months (parallel)
• Certification testing: 3 months
• FAA review and approval: 5 months
• International validations: 6 months (overlapping)

Key Challenges: Complex software (DO-178B Level C) with human interface elements. GPS receiver performance issues in certain interference environments. Multiple certification bases (TSO-C169a for Comm, TSO-C146c for GPS).

Success Factors: Modular architecture separating communication and navigation functions. Incremental testing approach. Experienced certification team with prior avionics approvals. Regular progress meetings with FAA Aircraft Certification Office.

Lessons Learned: Separating functions with different certification levels simplifies the process. Early human factors evaluation prevents interface issues later. Plan for at least 20% schedule contingency in complex projects.

These case studies demonstrate that successful certification projects share common elements: thorough planning, early engagement with authorities, pre-compliance testing, and experienced team members familiar with aviation certification processes.

Resources and Tools for Aviation Radio Certification

Numerous resources are available to assist with the aviation radio certification process, from official regulatory guidance to industry tools and professional services.

Official Regulatory Resources:

• FAA Advisory Circulars (especially AC 21-46, AC 21-40A)
• EASA Certification Specifications and Acceptable Means of Compliance
• FAA Order 8110.4C (Type Certification Process)
• FAA Order 8130.2J (Airworthiness Certification Procedures)
• EASA Part 21 (Certification of Aircraft and Related Products)

Industry Standards:

• RTCA Document Store (DO-160, DO-178C, etc.)
• EUROCAE Documents (ED-14, ED-12C, etc.)
• ARINC Specifications for Radio Equipment
• SAE Aerospace Standards

Testing Resources:

• Accredited DO-160 Testing Laboratories
• Environmental Testing Facilities
• RF Compliance Testing Services
• Software Verification Tools

Consulting and Support Services:

• Designated Engineering Representatives (DERs)
• Certification Consulting Firms
• DO-178C Software Certification Specialists
• Documentation Support Services

Software Tools:

• Requirements Management Systems (DOORS, Jama)
• Test Management Platforms
• Configuration Management Tools
• Compliance Tracking Software

TRACON sectors and frequency management play an important role in understanding how certified radio equipment integrates with air traffic control systems, providing valuable context for certification engineers.

Conclusion and Next Steps

The aviation radio certification process is complex but navigable with proper preparation, understanding, and resources. Success depends on thorough planning, careful attention to technical requirements, and systematic documentation throughout the development lifecycle.

Key success factors include:

• Early planning with clear understanding of applicable requirements
• Pre-compliance testing before formal certification testing
• Complete and organized documentation
• Experienced team members familiar with aviation certification
• Regular communication with certification authorities

For those beginning the certification process, consider this preparation checklist:

1. Identify all applicable regulations and standards
2. Develop a comprehensive certification plan
3. Create a detailed compliance checklist
4. Establish a documentation management system
5. Budget for testing and potential redesign iterations
6. Consider engaging certification specialists early

As aviation technology continues to evolve, certification processes will adapt to address new technologies like software-defined radios, automated frequency management, and integrated avionics systems. Staying current with regulatory developments and industry standards remains essential for successful certification.

Photo	TOP RATED WALKIE TALKIES	Price
	Retevis RT628 Walkie Talkies for Kids,Toy Gifts for 6-12 Year Old Boys Girls,Kid Gifts Walkie Talkie for Adults Outdoor Camping Hiking(Silvery 1 Pair)	Check Price On Amazon
	Cobra ACXT545 Weather-Resistant Walkie Talkies - Rechargeable, 22 Channels, Long Range 28-Mile Two-Way Radio Set (2-Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT388 Walkie Talkies for Kids, Toys for 6 7 8 9 12 Year Old Boys, 22 CH 2 Way Radio Backlit LCD Flashlight, Blue Walkie Talkies for Boys Gifts Easter Basket Stuffers(Blue, 2 Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Cobra RX680 Walkie Talkies (2-Pack) - Rugged & Splashproof Two Way Radios Long Range, IP54 Water Resistant Design, 60 Pre-Programmed Channels, Weather Alerts, Included Charging Dock (Black/Orange)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT22 Walkie Talkies, Mini 2 Way Radio Rechargeable, VOX Handsfree, Portable, Two-Way Radios Long Range with Earpiece, for Family Road Trip Camping Hiking Skiing(2 Pack, Black)	Check Price On Amazon
	Midland GXT1000VP4 GMRS Two-Way Radio (50 Channel, Long Range, 142 Privacy Codes, SOS, NOAA, Rechargeable Nickel Battery, Black/Silver 2-Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT628 Walkie Talkies for Kids,Toys Gifts for 6-12 Years Old Boys Girls,Long Range 2 Way Radio 22CH VOX,Birthday Gift,Family Walkie Talkie for Camping Hiking Indoor Outdoor	Check Price On Amazon