Why Aviation Uses AM Instead of FM: The Technical Story

AM radio dominates aviation communications despite FM’s superior audio quality. This preference stems from AM’s unique signal characteristics that allow pilots to hear multiple transmissions on the same frequency, enhancing safety during critical situations. In this post, you’ll discover the technical physics behind this choice, how altitude affects signal propagation, and why this century-old technology continues to serve modern aviation’s demanding requirements.

Understanding AM vs. FM: The Fundamental Technical Differences

Before exploring why AM dominates aviation communications, it’s essential to understand the fundamental technical differences between Amplitude Modulation (AM) and Frequency Modulation (FM) technologies.

Photo	Popular Portable Walkie Talkies	Price
	Multifunctional Smart Wireless Ski Goggles with Walkie-Talkie, Replaceable Anti-Fog Lens, Music & Call, Real-Time AMOLED Display, Compatible with Most Helmets (G03 Blue, Multi-Button Remote)	Check Price On Amazon
	SINORISE Super Mini Walkie Talkies, Portable Two-Way Radios for Restaurants, Outdoor Sports, Retail Stores, Hospital & Travel – 3 Pack	Check Price On Amazon
	KOSPET Tank M4C Outdoor Smart Watch with GPS, 1.96" AMOLED Display, Built-in LED Flashlight & Walkie-Talkie, Long Battery Life, 50m Waterproof, Bluetooth Calls, 24/7 Heart Rate/Sleep Monitor	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT15 Walkie Talkies, Portable FRS Two Way Radios Rechargeable, Durable, Compact, VOX, Key Lock, Mini Walkie Talkies for Adults and Kids, School Family Outdoor Travel Camping Hiking (3 Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Rechargeable Walkie Talkies Toys for Kids: DIY Astronaut Walkie Talkies for Boys Christmas Birthday Gifts for 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Boy Walkie Talkie Outdoor Hiking Toy 2 Way Radio Camping Outdoor Game	Check Price On Amazon

AM works by varying the amplitude (height) of a carrier wave while maintaining a constant frequency. The information is carried in these amplitude changes. FM, conversely, keeps the amplitude constant while varying the frequency of the carrier wave to encode information.

This fundamental difference creates distinct performance characteristics:

How AM and FM Signals Are Created and Transmitted

The fundamental difference between AM and FM lies in how information is encoded onto the carrier wave.

In AM systems, the audio information modulates (changes) the amplitude of a carrier wave. The aviation band uses carrier frequencies between 118.0-136.975 MHz. When you speak into an aviation radio microphone, your voice creates an electrical signal that varies the strength of the radio wave without changing its frequency.

Proper microphone gain settings to prevent distorted transmissions are crucial for clear AM signals. Too much gain causes overmodulation, while too little makes transmissions difficult to hear.

FM systems encode information by varying the frequency of the carrier wave while maintaining constant amplitude. This method produces better audio quality in normal conditions but behaves differently when signals overlap.

Signal Characteristics That Matter in Aviation Communications

Several key signal characteristics affect radio performance in aviation environments:

• Signal-to-noise ratio: FM typically provides better audio clarity in good conditions
• Bandwidth efficiency: AM requires less bandwidth, allowing more channels in the same spectrum
• Power requirements: AM transmitters draw more power during voice peaks, which can affect aircraft electrical systems
• Range capabilities: AM signals generally propagate farther at aviation altitudes
• Signal behavior during overlap: AM allows multiple signals to be heard simultaneously

When pilots transmit, their radios can cause a noticeable power draw that sometimes dims aircraft lights, especially in smaller planes with limited electrical capacity. This occurs because AM transmitters require varying power levels based on the audio input.

The Capture Effect: AM’s Critical Advantage for Aviation Safety

The ‘capture effect’ represents the single most important technical reason why aviation communication systems worldwide standardized on AM rather than FM technology.

In FM radio systems, when two signals broadcast on the same frequency, receivers lock onto the stronger signal and suppress the weaker one completely. This phenomenon, called the capture effect, means only the strongest signal is heard, while others are completely blocked.

AM radio behaves differently. When multiple AM signals transmit on the same frequency, all signals remain audible to some degree. The stronger signal dominates, but weaker signals remain intelligible in the background. This characteristic proves crucial for aviation safety.

According to International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards, this ability to hear multiple transmissions simultaneously provides essential safety benefits in crowded airspace where several aircraft might transmit at once.

How the Capture Effect Works: A Technical Breakdown

When multiple radio signals are transmitted on the same frequency, the way receivers process these overlapping signals differs dramatically between AM and FM systems.

In an FM receiver, when signal strength differs by as little as 3-6 dB (about twice the power), the stronger signal completely captures the receiver. The weaker signal becomes entirely inaudible. This happens because FM demodulation naturally suppresses amplitude variations, which is how the competing signal would manifest.

In AM receivers, signal mixing occurs additively. If two pilots transmit simultaneously, both transmissions combine at the receiver. While this creates some distortion, both messages remain partially intelligible. The stronger signal predominates, but critical information from the weaker signal often remains discernible.

This technical difference means that in FM systems, critical messages could be completely lost if another station transmits with slightly more power, while AM allows at least partial reception of both.

Real-World Aviation Scenarios Demonstrating the Capture Effect

The theoretical advantages of AM’s handling of signal overlap translate into critical safety benefits in these common aviation scenarios.

Consider a busy terminal area where multiple aircraft communicate with air traffic control. If two pilots transmit simultaneously using FM radios, controllers would hear only the stronger signal, potentially missing critical information from the other aircraft. With AM, controllers can often distinguish both transmissions and respond appropriately.

In emergency situations, this becomes even more critical. If an aircraft declaring an emergency transmits simultaneously with routine traffic, AM ensures the emergency call remains at least partially audible, allowing controllers to recognize the situation.

Pilots report that even when transmissions overlap, they can often “hear through” the stronger signal to understand parts of the weaker transmission, providing situational awareness that would be completely lost with FM systems.

Signal Propagation Physics: How AM Radio Waves Travel in Aviation Environments

The behavior of radio waves in the aviation environment presents unique challenges that AM technology addresses effectively.

Radio signals in the VHF aviation band (118-137 MHz) primarily travel by line-of-sight propagation. Unlike lower frequency bands that can follow the Earth’s curvature or bounce off the ionosphere, aviation radio waves travel relatively straight.

At typical aircraft cruising altitudes, this line-of-sight propagation provides exceptional range. A plane at 35,000 feet can potentially communicate with stations over 200 nautical miles away, far beyond what ground-based mobile radios typically achieve.

While both AM and FM use the same VHF band in aviation applications, AM signals maintain better intelligibility at the fringe of their reception range. As signal strength decreases with distance, AM transmissions gradually become noisier but remain understandable longer than FM, which tends to abruptly cut out below certain signal strengths.

International compliance with ICAO technical specifications for equipment standards ensures consistent radio performance across different aircraft and ground stations worldwide.

How Altitude and Distance Affect Aviation Radio Performance

Aircraft operate across vast ranges of altitude and distance, creating unique radio propagation challenges that AM technology addresses effectively.

Radio horizon distance can be calculated approximately as: Distance (in nautical miles) = 1.23 × √height (in feet). This means:

• At 1,000 feet altitude: ~39 NM radio range
• At 10,000 feet altitude: ~123 NM radio range
• At 35,000 feet altitude: ~230 NM radio range

At these distances, AM signals degrade more gracefully than FM. As signal strength decreases, AM transmissions become increasingly noisy but remain partially intelligible. FM signals maintain clarity until they reach a threshold where they suddenly become unintelligible.

This gradual degradation characteristic gives pilots and controllers more flexibility when operating at the edges of communication range, providing critical extra seconds or minutes of usable communication during climbs, descents, or when transitioning between radio coverage areas.

Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Aviation Radio Transmission

Various environmental factors impact radio wave propagation, with different effects on AM and FM transmissions.

Precipitation, particularly heavy rain or wet snow, can attenuate VHF signals regardless of modulation type. However, AM’s gradual degradation characteristics often allow some communication to continue during adverse weather when FM might cut out completely.

Proper connector weatherproofing prevents radio failure in rain conditions, which is critical for aviation safety. Water intrusion into connectors can cause impedance changes that affect transmission quality or cause complete equipment failure.

Temperature inversions can create atmospheric ducting effects, sometimes extending radio range far beyond normal limits. This can actually become problematic when distant aircraft unexpectedly appear on frequency, causing congestion.

Solar activity and ionospheric conditions have minimal direct impact on VHF aviation bands but can affect HF frequencies used for transoceanic communications. These effects are similar for both AM and FM modulation.

Historical Evolution: Why Aviation Standardized on AM Radio

The standardization on AM radio for aviation didn’t happen by accident—it evolved through decades of technical evaluation and practical experience.

Early aviation radio systems emerged in the 1920s, when AM technology was well-established while FM was still experimental. The first air-to-ground communications used low-frequency AM systems with limited range and poor reliability.

By the 1930s, higher frequency VHF systems emerged, still using AM modulation. The introduction of VHF improved clarity and reduced static, addressing many early complaints about aviation radio.

When Edwin Armstrong developed FM technology in the 1930s, aviation authorities evaluated it against existing AM systems. While FM offered improved audio quality, the critical multi-signal reception capability of AM proved more valuable for aviation’s unique needs.

The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) formally standardized AM for aviation communications in 1947, codifying what had already become common practice. This decision created the foundation for the global aviation communication infrastructure we still use today.

Early Aviation Radio Systems and Their Technical Limitations

The earliest aviation radio systems of the 1920s and 1930s faced significant technical constraints that shaped future development.

First-generation aircraft radios were massive, heavy systems that consumed significant power and provided limited reliability. These systems operated in the low and medium frequency bands (200-500 kHz), making them susceptible to atmospheric noise and limited in range.

Weight and space constraints in aircraft cabins made radio efficiency critical. Early vacuum tube transmitters were bulky and required dedicated radio operators on larger aircraft. The high power requirements strained primitive aircraft electrical systems.

Reliability challenges plagued early systems, with vibration, temperature extremes, and moisture all threatening communication capability. AM systems proved more robust in these demanding environments, with fewer components that could fail compared to the more complex FM demodulation circuits.

These practical limitations reinforced the aviation industry’s preference for AM technology, which offered the best combination of reliability, performance, and compatibility with existing infrastructure.

International Standardization and Regulatory Framework

The international nature of aviation necessitated global standards for communication systems, leading to coordinated adoption of AM technology.

ICAO’s establishment in 1944 created the framework for standardizing aviation communications worldwide. Annex 10 to the Chicago Convention specifically addresses aeronautical telecommunications, mandating AM-DSB (Double Sideband) for VHF air-ground communications.

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) allocated specific frequency bands for aviation use, with the 118-137 MHz VHF band reserved exclusively for aircraft communications. This global frequency allocation ensures aircraft can communicate consistently across international boundaries.

National aviation authorities implement these international standards through certification requirements for aircraft radio equipment. These requirements specify performance parameters like frequency stability, modulation depth, and harmonic suppression that all aviation radios must meet.

This regulatory framework creates a self-reinforcing ecosystem where AM remains the standard, as all aircraft and ground infrastructure worldwide conform to these specifications.

Modern Aviation Radio Systems: How AM Technology Has Evolved

While aviation has maintained AM as its primary modulation technology, modern aviation radio systems bear little resemblance to their early predecessors.

Today’s aviation radios incorporate sophisticated digital processing while maintaining AM compatibility. Digital frequency synthesis provides pinpoint accuracy and stability compared to the drift-prone crystal oscillators of earlier generations.

Advanced filtering techniques significantly improve signal-to-noise ratios, addressing one of AM’s traditional weaknesses. Automatic squelch controls, noise limiters, and audio filters enhance clarity without changing the fundamental modulation method.

Modern avionics integrate radio functions with other aircraft systems through digital buses and computerized management systems. Many systems feature frequency databases, allowing pilots to select stations by facility name rather than remembering frequencies.

Regular firmware updates for aviation radios provide enhanced features and fix bugs without requiring hardware changes. These updates maintain compatibility with the AM standard while adding modern capabilities.

Digital Enhancements to Traditional AM Aviation Radio

Modern aviation radios combine traditional AM modulation with sophisticated digital signal processing technologies.

Digital signal processors (DSPs) in current-generation radios dramatically improve reception quality through adaptive filtering. These systems can identify and reduce noise components while preserving voice intelligibility, addressing AM’s traditional susceptibility to static.

Voice enhancement algorithms apply equalization, compression, and noise gating to improve clarity. These techniques make communications more understandable without changing the fundamental AM modulation that ensures compatibility across all aviation platforms.

Digital frequency control provides stability to within ±0.0005% (about ±1 kHz at aviation frequencies), eliminating the drift problems that plagued early systems. This precision allows more channels to be packed into the available spectrum without increasing interference.

Advanced squelch systems use digital processing to differentiate between actual transmissions and random noise, reducing pilot fatigue from constant background static while ensuring no important communications are missed.

Integration with Aircraft Avionics and Communication Systems

Today’s aviation radio systems function as integrated components within sophisticated avionics architectures.

Modern audio panels serve as the central hub for all aircraft communications, allowing pilots to manage multiple radios, navigation receivers, intercom systems, and entertainment inputs. These digital systems maintain AM compatibility while adding sophisticated audio routing capabilities.

Radio Management Units (RMUs) provide centralized control of multiple communication and navigation systems through digital interfaces. These units allow frequency selection through integrated databases that automatically associate frequencies with facilities.

Redundancy requirements mandate backup communication capabilities, with many aircraft featuring multiple independent radio systems. These systems often include separate power sources and antenna systems to ensure communication capability even during partial electrical failures.

Emergency communication systems like the Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) operate independently from the primary communication radios but coordinate with the overall avionics architecture for activation and control.

Cost-effective digital solutions like DMR are emerging in general aviation, though these complement rather than replace traditional AM systems for primary air-ground communications.

AM vs. FM in Critical Aviation Scenarios: A Comparative Analysis

The technical differences between AM and FM translate into significant performance variations across different aviation scenarios.

In emergency situations, AM’s ability to transmit partial messages becomes crucial. If a pilot begins an emergency call but is cut off, even a partial transmission like “Mayday, Mayday, Delta 1234, engine…” provides controllers with critical information that might be completely lost with FM’s capture effect.

During high-traffic periods at busy airports, multiple simultaneous transmissions occur frequently. With AM, controllers can often distinguish between overlapping calls and respond accordingly. FM would render all but the strongest signal completely inaudible.

When operating at the edge of reception range, AM provides gradually degrading audio quality while FM tends to cut out entirely below certain signal strengths. This gives pilots using AM systems more opportunity to establish contact when transitioning between coverage areas.

Performance Comparison in High-Density Traffic Areas

In busy terminal areas where multiple aircraft communicate simultaneously, the technical characteristics of AM and FM create distinctly different operational outcomes.

At major airports like Chicago O’Hare or Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson, frequency congestion is a constant challenge. Controllers rely on AM’s characteristic of allowing partially intelligible overlapping transmissions to maintain situational awareness when multiple aircraft transmit simultaneously.

Air traffic controllers report that they can often distinguish between overlapping transmissions and respond to both aircraft, even when signals arrive at similar power levels. This capability would be impossible with FM’s capture effect, which would render one transmission completely inaudible.

During high-traffic periods, step-on (simultaneous) transmissions occur frequently. With AM, controllers can often hear enough of both transmissions to determine if one contains urgent information. This allows for appropriate prioritization that wouldn’t be possible if only the stronger signal were audible.

This capability becomes particularly important during approach and departure phases, where timely communication is most critical and radio frequency congestion reaches its peak.

Emergency Communication Reliability: AM vs. FM Analysis

During emergency situations, communication reliability becomes critically important, revealing key differences between AM and FM technologies.

Aviation emergency procedures require clear, concise radio communications, often under stressful conditions. The “Mayday” or “Pan-Pan” calls that signal emergencies must get through, even when competing with routine traffic on the same frequency.

With AM systems, even if an emergency call overlaps with another transmission, the distinctive “Mayday” call often remains audible enough for controllers to recognize the emergency and clear the frequency. FM’s capture effect could completely suppress such calls if they happen to be the weaker signal.

Partial message intelligibility becomes particularly valuable when aircraft systems are failing. If electrical problems or other emergencies cause a radio transmission to cut off mid-message, AM ensures that the portion transmitted likely remains audible to controllers, providing critical information.

Historical analysis of aviation incidents has shown multiple cases where partial transmissions provided crucial information that helped prevent accidents or guide rescue efforts, reinforcing the safety value of AM’s technical characteristics.

Practical Implications for Pilots and Air Traffic Controllers

The technical characteristics of AM radio systems create specific operational considerations for aviation professionals.

Pilots learn to use precise radio terminology and standard phraseology to maximize clarity on AM systems. Clear enunciation and proper microphone technique become essential skills to overcome AM’s inherent noise susceptibility.

Controllers must develop the ability to distinguish between multiple simultaneous transmissions, a skill that becomes second nature with experience. This “cocktail party effect” allows them to focus on specific transmissions even amid frequency congestion.

Both pilots and controllers employ techniques to compensate for AM’s technical limitations. These include:

• Speaking clearly at moderate pace
• Using standard phraseology
• Proper microphone positioning
• Listening carefully before transmitting
• Keeping transmissions brief and focused

Understanding the technical behavior of AM systems helps aviation professionals maximize communication effectiveness while working within the constraints of this legacy technology.

Optimizing Radio Communication Quality and Reliability

Understanding the technical characteristics of AM radio systems allows pilots and controllers to optimize their communication techniques.

Proper microphone technique significantly impacts AM transmission quality. Pilots should position the microphone 1-2 inches from their lips, speaking directly into it rather than across it. This maximizes voice clarity while minimizing ambient cockpit noise.

Transmission timing considerations help reduce step-ons (overlapping transmissions). Pilots should listen for 1-2 seconds before transmitting to ensure the frequency is clear, and pause briefly after pressing the transmit button before speaking to ensure the beginning of their message isn’t cut off.

Voice characteristics matter significantly in AM systems. Speaking at a moderate pace with clear enunciation improves intelligibility. During emergency or high-workload situations, pilots should consciously avoid speaking too rapidly, which compounds AM’s clarity limitations.

Regular radio checks verify proper functionality and optimal volume settings. These should be conducted at the beginning of flights and whenever changing to a new control facility to ensure optimal communication capability.

Troubleshooting Common Aviation Radio Issues

Even modern aviation radio systems can experience various technical issues that pilots and controllers must understand and address.

Weak or intermittent transmissions often result from antenna problems. Pilots should check antenna connections if others report difficulty receiving their transmissions. Ground-based static testing can identify issues before flight.

Stuck microphones (when a transmit button remains engaged) block entire frequencies. If a frequency goes silent after your transmission, check that your microphone isn’t inadvertently transmitting. Controllers will typically announce “stuck mic on frequency” when this occurs.

Electrical noise in the audio system often indicates alternator or other electrical system problems. A whining sound that changes with engine RPM typically suggests alternator issues that may require maintenance attention.

When radio communication fails completely, standard procedures include squawking 7600 on the transponder and following pre-established lost communication procedures. Aircraft with multiple radios should try alternate units and frequencies.

The Future of Aviation Communications: Will AM Radio Persist?

As aviation technology advances, the question naturally arises: will the century-old AM radio technology continue to serve aviation’s communication needs?

Several digital voice technologies are under development specifically for aviation use. The Future Communications Infrastructure (FCI) program is exploring options including VDL Mode 3 (VHF Digital Link) and LDACS (L-band Digital Aeronautical Communications System) that could eventually supplement or replace AM voice.

Data link communications already supplement voice in many operations. Controller-Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC) allows text-based messaging for routine instructions, reducing voice frequency congestion. However, these systems currently complement rather than replace voice communications.

The technical advantages of AM for emergency situations and overlapping transmissions remain relevant even as digital technologies advance. Any replacement would need to address these specific capabilities that have proven valuable for aviation safety.

Industry experts generally agree that AM voice will remain the primary air-ground communication method for at least the next 10-15 years. The massive installed base of equipment and the proven safety record of current systems create significant inertia against wholesale changes.

Next-Generation Communication Technologies Under Development

Several advanced communication technologies are being developed specifically to address the limitations of traditional aviation radio.

VDL Mode 3 provides digital voice and data capability while maintaining compatibility with existing frequency allocations. This technology digitizes voice communications, improving clarity and enabling features like selective calling and priority override.

LDACS (L-band Digital Aeronautical Communications System) operates in the 960-1164 MHz band and offers higher data rates with improved spectral efficiency. This system is being developed as part of the Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) program and the FAA’s NextGen initiative.

Satellite-based voice communications provide coverage in oceanic and remote areas where traditional VHF communications are unavailable. These systems already supplement traditional radio in transoceanic operations but face challenges including cost, latency, and reliability concerns.

Cognitive radio technologies that dynamically select optimal frequencies and modulation methods based on conditions show promise for future applications. These systems could potentially use AM when its characteristics are advantageous and switch to other modes when appropriate.

Challenges and Timeline for Aviation Communication Evolution

Despite technological advancements, several significant challenges must be overcome before aviation can transition from AM radio technology.

The global fleet of over 23,000 commercial aircraft and hundreds of thousands of general aviation aircraft represents an enormous installed equipment base. The cost of retrofitting this fleet with new communication systems would run into billions of dollars.

Regulatory approval processes for safety-critical aviation systems are necessarily rigorous and time-consuming. New communication technologies must demonstrate reliability equal to or better than existing systems, particularly for emergency scenarios.

International standardization is essential for aviation communications. Any new system would require global agreement through ICAO, involving complex negotiations among member states with varying priorities and resources.

Training requirements present another significant hurdle. Pilots, controllers, and maintenance personnel worldwide would need retraining on new systems, representing a massive undertaking for the industry.

Most experts estimate that while digital supplementation will continue to increase, a complete transition from AM voice communications is unlikely before 2035-2040 at the earliest.

Conclusion: The Technical Wisdom Behind Aviation’s AM Radio Choice

The persistence of AM radio in aviation represents a carefully considered technical decision based on specific performance characteristics that continue to serve aviation’s unique needs.

The capture effect, which initially appears to be a disadvantage of AM compared to FM’s superior audio clarity, proves to be its most significant advantage in aviation’s safety-critical environment. The ability to hear multiple transmissions simultaneously provides an essential safety margin in congested airspace.

AM’s gradual degradation at range edges, rather than FM’s abrupt cutoff, creates a more forgiving communication system that maintains partial intelligibility under marginal conditions. This characteristic provides valuable redundancy during critical flight phases.

While digital technologies continue to supplement voice communications, the fundamental advantages of AM for aviation’s unique requirements ensure its continued relevance. Any replacement technology would need to preserve these specific beneficial characteristics while addressing AM’s limitations.

The aviation industry’s conservative approach to safety-critical systems ensures that proven technologies remain in service until replacements demonstrate clear and comprehensive advantages. For now, the century-old AM technology continues to serve aviation’s unique communication needs with remarkable effectiveness.

Photo	TOP RATED WALKIE TALKIES	Price
	Retevis RT628 Walkie Talkies for Kids,Toy Gifts for 6-12 Year Old Boys Girls,Kid Gifts Walkie Talkie for Adults Outdoor Camping Hiking(Silvery 1 Pair)	Check Price On Amazon
	Cobra ACXT545 Weather-Resistant Walkie Talkies - Rechargeable, 22 Channels, Long Range 28-Mile Two-Way Radio Set (2-Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT388 Walkie Talkies for Kids, Toys for 6 7 8 9 12 Year Old Boys, 22 CH 2 Way Radio Backlit LCD Flashlight, Blue Walkie Talkies for Boys Gifts Easter Basket Stuffers(Blue, 2 Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Cobra RX680 Walkie Talkies (2-Pack) - Rugged & Splashproof Two Way Radios Long Range, IP54 Water Resistant Design, 60 Pre-Programmed Channels, Weather Alerts, Included Charging Dock (Black/Orange)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT22 Walkie Talkies, Mini 2 Way Radio Rechargeable, VOX Handsfree, Portable, Two-Way Radios Long Range with Earpiece, for Family Road Trip Camping Hiking Skiing(2 Pack, Black)	Check Price On Amazon
	Midland GXT1000VP4 GMRS Two-Way Radio (50 Channel, Long Range, 142 Privacy Codes, SOS, NOAA, Rechargeable Nickel Battery, Black/Silver 2-Pack)	Check Price On Amazon
	Retevis RT628 Walkie Talkies for Kids,Toys Gifts for 6-12 Years Old Boys Girls,Long Range 2 Way Radio 22CH VOX,Birthday Gift,Family Walkie Talkie for Camping Hiking Indoor Outdoor	Check Price On Amazon